How Does Risk-Information Communication Affect the Rebound of Online Public Opinion of Public Emergencies in China?

被引:15
作者
Gao, Shan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ye [1 ]
Liu, Wenhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Sch Publ Adm, Changsha 410083, Peoples R China
[2] Univ South China, Sch Econ Management & Law, Hengyang 421001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
risk-information communication; public emergencies; public health emergencies; rebound of online public opinion; fsQCA; DISASTER CHARACTERISTICS; DISSEMINATION; HEALTH; IMPACT; TRUST; PERCEPTION; EVOLUTION; SCIENCE; CRISIS; MEDIA;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18157760
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The rebound of online public opinion is an important driving force in inducing a secondary crisis in the case of public emergencies. Effective risk-information communication is an important means to manage online public opinion regarding emergencies. This paper employs fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to discover which conditions are combined and may result in the rebound of online public opinion. Five conditions were selected: the type of public emergency, messengers, message attributes, audience, and information feedback. The study used a sample of 25 major public emergencies that occurred between 2015 and 2020 in China. The type of public emergency, audience, and information feedback emerged as critical influencing factors. Message attributes promote the rebound of online public opinion regarding public health emergencies, while messengers play a traction role in the rebound of online public opinion on other types of public emergencies. This study extends risk-information communication theory from the perspective of the type of emergency, explores the causes of rebounded online public opinion regarding public emergencies, and provides policies and suggestions for risk-information communication and online public-opinion governance during emergencies.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
An L., 2016, J. Information and Documentation Services, V5, P44
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, IMPR RISK COMM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1948, COMMUN IDEAS
[4]  
Arafat S M Yasir, 2020, Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res, V37, P100, DOI 10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002
[5]   Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia [J].
Blair, Robert A. ;
Morse, Benjamin S. ;
Tsai, Lily L. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2017, 172 :89-97
[6]   Speaking of Risk: Matters of Context [J].
Boholm, Asa .
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNICATION-A JOURNAL OF NATURE AND CULTURE, 2009, 3 (03) :335-354
[7]   Risk Perception and the Economic Crisis: A Longitudinal Study of the Trajectory of Perceived Risk [J].
Burns, William J. ;
Peters, Ellen ;
Slovic, Paul .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2012, 32 (04) :659-677
[8]   COMMUNICATION-THEORY, LINGUISTICS, AND PSYCHOLINGUISTICS [J].
CARROLL, JB .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1958, 28 (02) :79-88
[9]   Risk communication in cyberspace: a brief review of the information-processing and mental models approaches [J].
Chen, Jing .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 36 :135-140
[10]   Modeling Public Opinion Reversal Process with the Considerations of External Intervention Information and Individual Internal Characteristics [J].
Chen, Tinggui ;
Wang, Yulong ;
Yang, Jianjun ;
Cong, Guodong .
HEALTHCARE, 2020, 8 (02)