In vitro and In silico biopharmaceutic regulatory guidelines for generic bioequivalence for oral products: Comparison among various regulatory agencies

被引:13
|
作者
Kollipara, Sivacharan [1 ]
Ahmed, Tausif [1 ]
Bhattiprolu, Adithya Karthik [1 ]
Chachad, Siddharth [1 ]
机构
[1] Dr Reddys Labs Ltd, Global Clin Management, Biopharmaceut Grp, Integrated Prod Dev Org IPDO, Hyderabad 500090, Telangana, India
关键词
bioequivalence; biowaiver; dissolution; IVIVC; PBPK modelling; PHARMACOKINETIC PBPK; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; DISSOLUTION; WORKSHOP; REQUIREMENTS; SIMULATION; EMA; FDA;
D O I
10.1002/bdd.2292
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Generic drug development is a complex process that involves development of formulation similar to reference product. Because of the complexity associated with generic drug development, many regulatory agencies have come up with various guidelines. Out of many guidelines, the biopharmaceutics classification system that was introduced in 1995 based on aqueous solubility and permeability helped many pharmaceutical scientists across the globe to utilize the tool for formulation development, waiver of in vivo studies. Later on in vitro guidelines based on dissolution and in vitro in vivo correlation were introduced by many regulatory agencies with an intent to reduce number of in vivo human testing thereby facilitating shorter development time and faster approvals and launch. Most recently, understanding the importance in silico approaches such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling, regulatory agencies such as United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) and European Middle East and Africa (EMA) came up with modelling guidance documents. Even though consensus exists between guidance documents from various regulatory agencies, still there are many minor to major differences exists between these guidance documents that needs to be considered while submitting a generic drug application. This review aims to compare all the in vitro and in silico guidance documents from major regulatory agencies with emphasis on latest trends and technologies combined with regulatory acceptability with an intention to harmonize regulations. Guidance documents from major regulatory agencies such as USFDA, EMA, World Health Organization, International Council for Harmonization and other emerging markets were compared. Similarities &differences among these guidance documents are critically reviewed to provide the reader a detailed overview of these guidance documents at one place.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 318
页数:22
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Bioequivalence Study Designs for Generic Solid Oral Anticancer Drug Products: Scientific and Regulatory Considerations
    Kaur, Paramjeet
    Chaurasia, Chandra S.
    Davit, Barbara M.
    Conner, Dale P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 53 (12): : 1252 - 1260
  • [2] Survey of International Regulatory Bioequivalence Recommendations for Approval of Generic Topical Dermatological Drug Products
    April C. Braddy
    Barbara M. Davit
    Ethan M. Stier
    Dale P. Conner
    The AAPS Journal, 2015, 17 : 121 - 133
  • [3] An Update of the Brazilian Regulatory Bioequivalence Recommendations for Approval of Generic Topical Dermatological Drug Products
    Costa Soares, Kelen Carine
    Lima Santos, Gustavo Mendes
    Gelfuso, Guilherme M.
    Gratieri, Tais
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2015, 17 (06): : 1517 - 1518
  • [4] An Update of the Brazilian Regulatory Bioequivalence Recommendations for Approval of Generic Topical Dermatological Drug Products
    Kelen Carine Costa Soares
    Gustavo Mendes Lima Santos
    Guilherme M. Gelfuso
    Tais Gratieri
    The AAPS Journal, 2015, 17 : 1517 - 1518
  • [5] Current regulatory scenario and alternative surrogate methods to establish bioequivalence of topical generic products
    Mohan, Vignesh
    Wairkar, Sarika
    JOURNAL OF DRUG DELIVERY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 61
  • [6] Survey of International Regulatory Bioequivalence Recommendations for Approval of Generic Topical Dermatological Drug Products
    Braddy, April C.
    Davit, Barbara M.
    Stier, Ethan M.
    Conner, Dale P.
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2015, 17 (01): : 121 - 133
  • [7] Bioequivalence Common Deficiencies in Generic Products Submitted for Registration to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA)
    Lerato Moeti
    Madira Litedu
    Jacques Joubert
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2022, 56 : 822 - 838
  • [8] Bioequivalence Common Deficiencies in Generic Products Submitted for Registration to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA)
    Moeti, Lerato
    Litedu, Madira
    Joubert, Jacques
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2022, 56 (05) : 822 - 838
  • [9] Bioequivalence of topical generic products. Part 2. Paving the way to a tailored regulatory system
    Miranda, Margarida
    Sousa, Joao Jose
    Veiga, Francisco
    Cardoso, Catarina
    Vitorino, Carla
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 122 : 264 - 272
  • [10] Simplified Model-Dependent and Model-Independent Approaches for Dissolution Profile Comparison for Oral Products: Regulatory Perspective for Generic Product Development
    Kollipara, Sivacharan
    Boddu, Rajkumar
    Ahmed, Tausif
    Chachad, Siddharth
    AAPS PHARMSCITECH, 2022, 23 (01)