Integrating and ranking sustainability criteria for housing

被引:26
作者
Abdul-Rahman, Hamzah [1 ]
Wang, Chen [2 ]
Wood, Lincoln C. [3 ]
Ebrahimi, Makdokht [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Univ Malaya Wales, Vice Chancellors Off, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Malaya, Fac Built Environm, Ctr Construct Innovat & Project Management CIPM, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[3] Auckland Univ Technol, Fac Business & Law, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
environment; sustainability; town & city planning; CONSTRUCTION-INDUSTRY; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; EVALUATION MODEL; PERFORMANCE; ENERGY; MALAYSIA; POLICIES; QUALITY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1680/ensu.15.00008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Numerous researchers have determined building sustainability criteria relating to environmental performance, but the other two sustainability components - economic and social performance - have not been taken into consideration in an integrated and hierarchical manner. Existing sustainability assessment methods generally ignore economic and social aspects, and sustainable criteria are not prioritised for facilitating decision making. This paper reports how a fuzzy analytic hierarchical process tool was employed to prioritise sustainability criteria for residential buildings for environmental, economic and social performance in an integrated manner. A structured expert-based development process, comprising 17 building practitioners and eight academics from 16 nations was conducted globally. A fuzzy weighted hierarchy for all three aspects of sustainability in residential buildings was developed at the end of the study. Assisted by programmers, the hierarchy is expected to be developed into computer software in the near future to improve construction management.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 30
页数:28
相关论文
共 63 条
[41]   Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA [J].
Ortiz, Oscar ;
Castells, Francesc ;
Sonnemann, Guido .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2009, 23 (01) :28-39
[42]  
Pitt Michael, 2009, Construction Innovation, V9, P201, DOI 10.1108/14714170910950830
[43]   Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - A review [J].
Pohekar, SD ;
Ramachandran, M .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2004, 8 (04) :365-381
[44]   A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures [J].
Promentilla, Michael Angelo B. ;
Furuichi, T. ;
Ishii, K. ;
Tanikawa, N. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 88 (03) :479-495
[45]   The index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for a local authority: A case study in Italy [J].
Pulselli, Federico Maria ;
Ciampalini, Francesca ;
Tiezzi, Enzo ;
Zappia, Carlo .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 60 (01) :271-281
[46]  
Quigley D, 2007, P 23 ANN ARCOM C 3 5, P821
[47]  
Saaty TL, 2008, INT J SERV SCI, V1, P83, DOI [DOI 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590, 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590]
[48]   Developing sustainability criteria for urban infrastructure systems [J].
Sahely, HR ;
Kennedy, CA ;
Adams, BJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2005, 32 (01) :72-85
[49]   How Can the Construction Industry Contribute to Sustainable Development? A Conceptual Framework [J].
Sev, Aysin .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 17 (03) :161-173
[50]   Changes in the traditional urban form and the social sustainability of contemporary cities: A case study of Iranian cities [J].
Sharifi, Ayyoob ;
Murayama, Akito .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 38 :126-134