An innovative nonpharmacological intervention combined with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia increased patient global improvement in pain and satisfaction after major surgery

被引:6
作者
Chuang, Chia-Chun [1 ]
Lee, Chien-Ching [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Li-Kai [1 ]
Lin, Bor-Shyh [2 ]
Wu, Wen-Ju [1 ]
Ho, Chung-Han [3 ]
Chen, Jen-Yin [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Chi Mei Med Ctr, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Dept Imaging & Biomed Photon, Hsinchu, Taiwan
[3] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Med Res, Chi Mei Med Ctr, Tainan, Taiwan
[4] Chia Nan Univ Pharm & Sci, Dept Senior Citizen Serv Management, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
acute pain service; patient-physician communication; nonpharmacological approach; patient-controlled analgesia; patient satisfaction; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PSYCHOLOGICAL-FACTORS; MANAGEMENT; PHYSICIAN; COMMUNICATION; QUALITY; IMPLEMENTATION; QUESTIONNAIRE; PERSPECTIVES; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.2147/NDT.S131517
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate whether a nonpharmacological approach through implementation of a communication improvement program (named CICARE for Connect, Introduce, Communicate, Ask, Respond and Exit) into standard operating procedure (SOP) in acute pain service (APS) improved satisfaction in patients receiving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA). Patients and methods: This was a nonrandomized before-after study. Adult patients (aged between 20 and 80 years) who received IV-PCA after major surgery were included. Implementing CICARE into SOP was conducted in APS. Anonymous questionnaires were used to measure outcomes in this prospective two-part survey. The first part completed by APS nurses contained patients' characteristics, morphine dosage, delivery/demand ratios, IV-PCA side effects and pain at rest measured with an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10). A score of NRS. 4 was defined as inadequately treated pain. The ten-question second part was completed by patients voluntarily after IV-PCA was discontinued. Each question was assessed with a 5-point Likert scale (1: extremely poor; 5: excellent). Patients were separated into "before" and "after" CICARE groups. Primary outcomes were patient global impression of improvement in pain (PGI-Improvement) and patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included quality of communication skills, instrument proficiency and accessibility/availability of IV-PCA. Results: The response rate was 55.3%, with 187 usable questionnaires. CICARE effectively improved patient global impression of improvement in pain, patient satisfaction, communication skills and accessibility/availability of IV-PCA. No significant differences were noted in instrument proficiency, morphine dosage, delivery/demand ratios, rates of inadequately treated pain at rest and side effects of IV-PCA between groups. Paradoxical findings were noted between the rates of inadequately treated pain/side effects and PGI-Improvement in pain/patient satisfaction, which were affected by psychological factors. Conclusion: Nonpharmacological interventions carried out by implementing CICARE into SOP for APS effectively improved patient satisfaction and postoperative pain management quality, but this did not affect actual pain.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1042
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Impact of a Script-based Communication Intervention on Patient Satisfaction with Pain Management [J].
Alaloul, Fawwaz ;
Williams, Kimberly ;
Myers, John ;
Jones, Kayla Dlauren ;
Logsdon, M. Cynthia .
PAIN MANAGEMENT NURSING, 2015, 16 (03) :321-327
[2]   World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [J].
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 310 (20) :2191-2194
[3]  
Beaumont Kate, 2008, Nurs Stand, V23, P43
[4]   Patients' perspectives on ideal physician behaviors [J].
Bendapudi, NM ;
Berry, LL ;
Frey, KA ;
Parish, JT ;
Rayburn, WL .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 81 (03) :338-344
[5]  
Bernard HR., 2011, RES METHODS ANTHR QU, DOI DOI 10.4314/EAMJ.V77I9.46690
[6]   Assessment of pain [J].
Breivik, H. ;
Borchgrevink, P. C. ;
Allen, S. M. ;
Rosseland, L. A. ;
Romundstad, L. ;
Hals, E. K. Breivik ;
Kvarstein, G. ;
Stubhaug, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 101 (01) :17-24
[7]   Factors predictive of patient satisfaction with anesthesia [J].
Capuzzo, Maurizia ;
Gilli, Giuseppe ;
Paparella, Laura ;
Gritti, Gaetano ;
Gambi, Davide ;
Bianconi, Margherita ;
Giunta, Francesco ;
Buccoliero, Cosimetta ;
Alvisi, Raffaele .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2007, 105 (02) :435-442
[8]   COPING WITH TAXONOMY - REPLY [J].
CLIFFORD, PA ;
GORSUCH, R ;
PERRY, F ;
WHITE, PF .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1994, 10 (01) :84-85
[9]  
Cole B Eliot, 2004, FDA Consum, V38, P40
[10]   Time and the patient-physician relationship [J].
Dugdale, DC ;
Epstein, R ;
Pantilat, SZ .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 14 (Suppl 1) :S34-S40