Readability of Health Related Quality of Life Instruments in Urology

被引:22
|
作者
Bergman, Jonathan [1 ]
Gore, John L. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Singer, Jennifer S. [1 ]
Anger, Jennifer T. [1 ]
Litwin, Mark S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[5] Vet Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 2010年 / 183卷 / 05期
关键词
urology; reading; comprehension; quality of life; questionnaires; PROSTATE-CANCER; QUESTIONNAIRE; INFORMATION; DISEASES; INTERNET; IMPACT; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.107
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The average American adult reads at a fifth to eighth-grade level, with wide variability, presenting challenges for the assessment of self-reported health related quality of life. We identified the health related quality of life instruments used in patients with urological diseases and evaluated their readability. Materials and Methods: We focused on the most burdensome urological diseases, based on total expenditures in the United States. We then identified disease specific instruments by systematically searching PubMed (R), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Googlel (TM), Google Scholar (TM), the Patient Reported Outcome and Quality of Life Instruments Database (Mapi Research Institute, Lyon, France) and Yahoo!(R) for health related quality of life studies in patients with these urological conditions. Where disease specific instruments were lacking, we noted the general health related quality of life measures most commonly used. For each instrument, we calculated the median Flesch-Kincaid grade level, the proportion of questionnaire items below an eighth-grade reading level, the mean Flesch Reading Ease, and the mean number of words per sentence and characters per word, all of which are validated measures of readability. Results: The average +/-SD of the median Flesh-Kincaid reading levels was 6.5 +/- 2.1 (range 1.0 to 12.0). Of the 76 instruments 61 (80%) were at or below an eighth-grade reading level. The mean reading ease was greater than 30 for each of the 76 questionnaires and greater than 60 for 66 (87%). Urinary tract infection, the costliest urological disease, has only 1 disease specific health related quality of life measure. Urolithiasis, the second costliest, has none. Conclusions: The reading level of health related quality of life questionnaires in urology is appropriate for the reading ability of most adults in the United States. However, the most burdensome urological diseases lack disease specific health related quality of life instruments.
引用
收藏
页码:1977 / 1981
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adult oral health-related quality of life instruments: A systematic review
    Riva, Fedrico
    Seoane, Mariana
    Reichenheim, Michael Eduardo
    Tsakos, Georgios
    Celeste, Roger Keller
    COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 50 (05) : 333 - 338
  • [32] Exploring the measurement of health related quality of life and broader instruments: A dimensionality analysis
    Suasnabar, Jan M. Heijdra
    Finch, Aureliano Paolo
    Mulhern, Brendan
    van den Akker-van Marle, M. Elske
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2024, 346
  • [33] Critical review of generic and dermatology specific health related quality of life instruments
    Nijsten, T.
    Both, H.
    Busschbach, J. J.
    Essink-Bot, M. L.
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 127 : S28 - S28
  • [34] Assessing the quality and readability of NHS urology webpages in England
    Pook, Celina J.
    Thomas, Kay
    Bultitude, Matthew F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2022, 15 (05) : 429 - 433
  • [37] A systematic review of health-related quality of life instruments in patients with cancer cachexia
    Sally Wheelwright
    Anne-Sophie Darlington
    Jane B. Hopkinson
    Deborah Fitzsimmons
    Alice White
    Colin D. Johnson
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2013, 21 : 2625 - 2636
  • [38] Establishing equivalence measures from different health-related quality of life instruments
    Cella, DF
    Chang, CH
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1997, 6 (7-8) : 60 - 60
  • [39] On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation
    C.B. Terwee
    F.W. Dekker
    W.M. Wiersinga
    M.F. Prummel
    P.M.M. Bossuyt
    Quality of Life Research, 2003, 12 : 349 - 362
  • [40] Effect of order of administration of health-related quality of life interview instruments on responses
    Ashley L. Childs
    Quality of Life Research, 2005, 14 : 493 - 500