Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Detection of Crohn's Disease Activity: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:64
|
作者
Serafin, Zbigniew [1 ]
Bialecki, Marcin [1 ]
Bialecka, Agnieszka [2 ]
Sconfienza, Luca Maria [3 ,4 ]
Klopocka, Maria [5 ]
机构
[1] Nicholas Copernicus Univ, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, Coll Med, Ul M Sklodowskiej Curie 9, PL-85094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[2] Nicholas Copernicus Univ, Dept Dermatol Sexually Transmitted Dis & Immunode, Coll Med, PL-85094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
[3] Univ Milan, IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Dept Radiol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Milan, Dept Biomed Sci Hlth, Milan, Italy
[5] Nicholas Copernicus Univ, Coll Med, Chair Vasc Dis & Internal Med, PL-85094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
关键词
Crohn's disease; CEUS; meta-analysis; INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; TRANSABDOMINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; ACTIVITY INDEX; POWER-DOPPLER; US; ENTEROGRAPHY; SONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjv196
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Aims: Reports on imaging of active Crohn's disease (aCD) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) are encouraging. However, the statistical power of most published papers is limited due to the small size of the patient groups included. This study was performed to verify the diagnostic value of CEUS in detecting aCD. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed by two independent reviewers for articles on the test characteristics of CEUS for the identification of aCD. The quality of the analysed studies was evaluated using a quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2). Pooling was performed using a diagnostic random-effect model and bivariate analysis. Results: Eight articles were included in the final analysis, with a total of 332 patients. There was no significant publication bias. Significant heterogeneity was found regarding CEUS methodology and sonographic definitions of aCD. In a bivariate analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.87-0.97) and pooled specificity was 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.88). Spearman correlation statistics presented no significant diagnostic threshold effect (r = 0.12, p > 0.9). Subgroup analysis showed that relative intestine wall enhancement had the highest diagnostic value (area under the curve 94%), while the presence of enhancement and analysis of the slope were less useful (area under the curve 91 and 90%, respectively). Conclusions: CEUS presents good sensitivity and moderate specificity in the detection of the aCD. Large-scale randomized trials with quantitative evaluation of CEUS images are necessary to promote this technique in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 362
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
    Li, Jing
    Kong, Wei-min
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2025, 66 (05) : 461 - 469
  • [32] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Renal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Pan, Ke-Hao
    Jian, Li
    Chen, Wei-Jun
    Nikzad, Abdul Aziz
    Kong, Fang Q.
    Bin, Xu
    Wang, Ya-Li
    Chen, Ming
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [33] Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) and Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasound (ECEUS) for the Differentiation of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    D'Onofrio, M.
    Biagioli, E.
    Gerardi, C.
    Canestrini, S.
    Rulli, E.
    Crosara, S.
    De Robertis, R.
    Floriani, I.
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2014, 35 (06): : 515 - 521
  • [34] DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND FOR OVARIAN CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS
    Wu, Ying
    Peng, Hongling
    Zhao, Xia
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 41 (04) : 967 - 974
  • [35] A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic capability of automated breast ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in breast cancer
    Zhang, Haoyu
    Hu, Jingyi
    Meng, Rong
    Liu, Fangfang
    Xu, Fan
    Huang, Min
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
  • [36] Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Renal Cancer and in Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography: A Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Fan
    Li, Rui
    Li, Gang
    Jin, Lifang
    Shi, Qiusheng
    Du, Lianfang
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (04) : 903 - 914
  • [37] Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters in Crohn Disease: Their Role in Disease Activity Determination With Ultrasound
    Medellin-Kowalewski, Alexandra
    Wilkens, Rune
    Wilson, Alexandra
    Ruan, Ji
    Wilson, Stephanie R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (01) : 64 - 73
  • [38] Small Intestinal Contrast Ultrasonography (SICUS) in Crohn's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Losurdo, Giuseppe
    De Bellis, Margherita
    Rima, Raffaella
    Palmisano, Chiara Maria
    Dell'Aquila, Paola
    Iannone, Andrea
    Ierardi, Enzo
    Di Leo, Alfredo
    Principi, Mariabeatrice
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (24)
  • [39] Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of Crohn's disease activity: comparison with computed tomography enterography
    Ding, Shi-Si
    Liu, Chang
    Zhang, Yi-Feng
    Sun, Li-Ping
    Xiang, Li-Hua
    Liu, Hui
    Fang, Yan
    Ren, Wei-Wei
    Zhao, Hui
    Sun, Xiao-Min
    Zhang, Kun
    Zhang, Chang-Bao
    Xu, Xiao-Rong
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2022, 127 (10): : 1068 - 1078
  • [40] Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano
    Bignotti, Bianca
    Rossi, Federica
    Signori, Alessio
    Sormani, Maria Pia
    Valdora, Francesca
    Calabrese, Massimo
    Houssami, Nehmat
    BREAST, 2016, 28 : 13 - 19