Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth

被引:69
作者
Roobol, Monique J. [1 ]
Verbeek, Jan F. M. [1 ]
van der Kwast, Theo [2 ]
Kummerlin, Intan P. [2 ]
Kweldam, Charlotte F. [2 ]
van Leenders, Geert J. L. H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Urol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cribriform; International Society of Urological Pathology grading system; Intraductal carcinoma; Prediction model; Prognosis; Prostate cancer; Risk calculator; PREDICTION MODELS; FOLLOW-UP; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; ERSPC; MEN; MORTALITY; CARCINOMA; OUTCOMES; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.033
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The survival rate for men with International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 prostate cancer (PCa) without invasive cribriform (CR) and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) is similar to that for ISUP grade 1. If updated into the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC Rotterdam) risk calculator number 3 (RC3), this may further improve upfront selection of men who need a biopsy. Objective: To improve the number of possible biopsies avoided, while limiting undiagnosed clinically important PCa by applying the updated RC3 for risk-based patient selection. Design, setting, and participants: The RC3 is based on the first screening round of the ERSPC Rotterdam, which involved 3616 men. In 2015, histopathologic slides for PCa cases (n = 885) were re-evaluated. Low-risk (LR) PCa was defined as ISUP grade 1 or 2 without CR/IDC. High-risk (HR) PCa was defined as ISUP grade 2 with CR/IDC and PCa with ISUP grade >= 3. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: We updated the RC3 using multinomial logistic regression analysis, including data on age, PSA, digital rectal examination, and prostate volume, for predicting LR and HR PCa. Predictive accuracy was quantified using receiver operating characteristic analysis and decision curve analysis. Results and limitations: Men without PCa could effectively be distinguished from men with LR PCa and HR PCa (area under the curve 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.72 and 0.92, 95% CI 0.90-0.94). At a 1% risk threshold, the updated calculator would lead to a 34% reduction in unnecessary biopsies, while only 2% of HR PCa cases would be undiagnosed. Conclusions: A relatively simple risk stratification tool augmented with a highly sensitive contemporary pathologic biopsy classification would result in a considerable decrease in unnecessary prostate biopsies and overdiagnosis of potentially indolent disease. Patient summary: We improved a well-known prostate risk calculator with a new pathology classification system that better reflects disease burden. This new risk calculator allows individualized prediction of the chance of having (potentially aggressive) biopsydetectable prostate cancer and can guide shared decision-making when considering prostate biopsy. (C) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 51
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans
    Alberts, Arnout R.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    van Leenders, Geert J.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (06) : 1129 - 1134
  • [2] Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines
    Bruinsma, Sophie M.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Leapman, Michael S.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Petrides, Neophytos
    Weerakoon, Mahesha
    Bokhorst, Leonard P.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2016, 13 (03) : 151 - 167
  • [3] Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer
    Buzzoni, Carlotta
    Auvinen, Anssi
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Moss, Sue M.
    Puliti, Donella
    de Koning, Harry J.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Denis, Louis J.
    Kwiatkowski, Maciej
    Lujan, Marcos
    Nelen, Vera
    Paez, Alvaro
    Randazzo, Marco
    Rebillard, Xavier
    Tammela, Teuvo L. J.
    Villers, Arnauld
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Zappa, Marco
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (05) : 885 - 890
  • [4] The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    Egevad, Lars
    Amin, Mahul B.
    Delahunt, Brett
    Srigley, John R.
    Humphrey, Peter A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 40 (02) : 244 - 252
  • [5] Gayet M, 2016, EUR UROL FO IN PRESS
  • [6] PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING
    GLEASON, DF
    MELLINGE.GT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [7] Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study
    Gronberg, Henrik
    Adolfsson, Jan
    Aly, Markus
    Nordstrom, Tobias
    Wiklund, Peter
    Brandberg, Yvonne
    Thompson, James
    Wiklund, Fredrik
    Lindberg, Johan
    Clements, Mark
    Egevad, Lars
    Eklund, Martin
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2015, 16 (16) : 1667 - 1676
  • [8] 10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hamdy, F. C.
    Donovan, J. L.
    Lane, J. A.
    Mason, M.
    Metcalfe, C.
    Holding, P.
    Davis, M.
    Peters, T. J.
    Turner, E. L.
    Martin, R. M.
    Oxley, J.
    Robinson, M.
    Staffurth, J.
    Walsh, E.
    Bollina, P.
    Catto, J.
    Doble, A.
    Doherty, A.
    Gillatt, D.
    Kockelbergh, R.
    Kynaston, H.
    Paul, A.
    Powell, P.
    Prescott, S.
    Rosario, D. J.
    Rowe, E.
    Neal, D. E.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (15) : 1415 - 1424
  • [9] Mortality results from the Goteborg randomised population-based prostate-cancer screening trial
    Hugosson, Jonas
    Carlsson, Sigrid
    Aus, Gunnar
    Bergdahl, Svante
    Khatami, Ali
    Lodding, Par
    Pihl, Carl-Gustaf
    Stranne, Johan
    Holmberg, Erik
    Lilja, Hans
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (08) : 725 - 732
  • [10] Ilic D, 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V2013