A review of wind erosion models: Data requirements, processes, and validity

被引:116
作者
Jarrah, Mahboube [1 ]
Mayel, Sonia [1 ]
Tatarko, John [2 ]
Funk, Roger [3 ]
Kuka, Katrin [1 ]
机构
[1] Julius Kuehn Inst, Fed Res Ctr Cultivated Plants, Inst Crop & Soil Sci, Bundesallee 58, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
[2] USDA ARS, Rangeland Resources & Syst Res Unit, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[3] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Inst Soil Landscape Res, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
关键词
Wind erosion models; Model validity; Model database; Mechanisms of wind erosion; PREDICTION SYSTEM; SOIL-EROSION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; UNITED-STATES; VALIDATION; SIMULATION; RWEQ; DEPOSITION; ROUGHNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2019.104388
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Wind erosion is a threat for numerous landscapes throughout the world, which can be promoted or suppressed by direct and indirect impacts. In recent years, great efforts have been made to determine magnitudes of wind-induced soil erosion under different environmental conditions and management practices. With the advent of wind erosion models, a better understanding of the dynamics and underlying mechanisms of wind erosion provides the basis for assessing not only soil erodibility, but also different conservation management practices with the aim of controlling soil erosion by wind. Different wind erosion models exist with varying degrees of complexity and specific capabilities as well as a range of spatial and temporal scales of application. Due to their uncertainties and limitations, their applicability to different regions and research questions is still under debate. This paper reviews several commonly used wind erosion models to compare the underlying concepts of wind erosion dynamics and provides some guidelines with respect to the models' applicability, expected validity, required databases, available outputs and future directions of modelling research.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 107 条
[51]  
Gregory J.M., 1999, SUSTAINING GLOBAL FA, P29
[52]   TEAM: integrated, process-based wind-erosion model [J].
Gregory, JM ;
Wilson, GR ;
Singh, UB ;
Darwish, MM .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (02) :205-215
[53]  
Hagen LJ, 2008, T ASABE, V51, P129, DOI 10.13031/2013.24233
[54]  
Hagen L. J., 1995, P WEPP WEPS S SOIL W
[55]  
HAGEN LJ, 1991, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V46, P106
[56]   Evaluation of the Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) erosion submodel on cropland fields [J].
Hagen, LJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (02) :171-176
[57]  
Hagen LJ, 1999, T ASAE, V42, P1715, DOI 10.13031/2013.13334
[58]   Soil erosion response to climatic change and human activity during the Quaternary on the Loess Plateau, China [J].
He, Xiubin ;
Zhou, Jie ;
Zhang, Xinbao ;
Tang, Keli .
REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2006, 6 (1-2) :62-70
[59]   Sand transportation and reverse patterns over leeward face of sand dune [J].
Jiang, Hong ;
Dun, Hongchao ;
Tong, Ding ;
Huang, Ning .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2017, 283 :41-47
[60]   Comparison of measured wind tunnel and SWEEP simulated soil losses [J].
Liu, Benli ;
Qu, Jianjun ;
Niu, Qinghe ;
Han, Qingjie .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2014, 207 :23-29