Development and psychometric evaluation of the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale

被引:8
|
作者
Larsson, Fanny [1 ]
Engstrom, Asa [1 ]
Stromback, Ulrica [1 ]
Gustafsson, Silje [1 ]
机构
[1] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Hlth Sci, Div Nursing & Med Technol, SE-97187 Lulea, Sweden
来源
NURSING OPEN | 2021年 / 8卷 / 05期
关键词
dimensions of safety; feeling safe; instrument development; nursing; patient safety; perioperative period; psychometric evaluation; regional anaesthesia; safety; surgery; PATIENTS EXPERIENCES; CONTENT VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1002/nop2.1003
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: The aim of this study is to develop and psychometrically test the Feeling Safe During Surgery Scale. Design: The study design was non-experimental and cross-sectional. Method: The evaluation followed classical test theory, and the instrument was evaluated regarding reliability, construct validity and content validity. For the reliability analysis, a postal questionnaire consisting of the 16 items of the scale was dispatched in March 2020 to a consecutive sample (N = 242) of patients who had undergone hip or knee replacement arthroplasties with regional anaesthesia. Five experts in nursing care evaluated the content validity of the scale. Result: Internal consistency was 0.841. Three items were excluded due to deficits in reliability, resulting in a 13-item scale. A principal component analysis revealed a two-dimensional solution, labelled internal and external aspects of feeling safe. Two items were rephrased to improve clarity and content validity. The average content validity for the scale was 0.88, indicating acceptable content validity.
引用
收藏
页码:2452 / 2460
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Justice Scale (SJS']JS)
    Torres-Harding, Susan R.
    Siers, Brian
    Olson, Bradley D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 50 (1-2) : 77 - 88
  • [22] Development and psychometric evaluation of the artificial intelligence attitude scale for nurses
    Tuğba Öztürk Yıldırım
    Mesut Karaman
    BMC Nursing, 24 (1)
  • [23] The thriving of older people assessment scale: Psychometric evaluation and short-form development
    Baxter, Rebecca
    Lovheim, Hugo
    Bjork, Sabine
    Skoldunger, Anders
    Lindkvist, Marie
    Sjogren, Karin
    Sandman, Per-Olof
    Bergland, Adel
    Winblad, Bengt
    Edvardsson, David
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (12) : 3831 - 3843
  • [24] The Chinese Spiritual Coping Scale: Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation
    Feng, Jiahe
    Li, Yue
    Sun, Yiwen
    Wang, Lin
    Qi, Wei
    Wang, Kenneth T.
    Xue, Yunzhen
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2021, 60 (01) : 458 - 474
  • [25] The Chinese Spiritual Coping Scale: Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation
    Jiahe Feng
    Yue Li
    Yiwen Sun
    Lin Wang
    Wei Qi
    Kenneth T. Wang
    Yunzhen Xue
    Journal of Religion and Health, 2021, 60 : 458 - 474
  • [26] Development and psychometric evaluation of the revised university student hassles scale
    Pett, MA
    Johnson, MJM
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2005, 65 (06) : 984 - 1010
  • [27] Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lifestyle Medicine Health Behavior Scale
    Pangalangan, Julia
    Puma, Jini
    Tollefson, Michelle
    Frates, Beth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [28] Parental Evaluation Scale (EEP): Development, Psychometric Properties and Applications
    Farkas-Klein, Chamarrita
    UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 7 (02) : 457 - 467
  • [29] The Professionalism and Environmental Factors in the Workplace Questionnaire®: development and psychometric evaluation
    Baumann, Andrea
    Kolotylo, Camille
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2009, 65 (10) : 2216 - 2228
  • [30] The development and psychometric evaluation of the Clinicians' Attitudes towards Responding and Escalating care of Deteriorating patients scale
    Chua, Wei Ling
    Tee, Augustine
    Hassan, Norasyikin Binte
    Jones, Daryl
    Tam, Wilson Wai San
    Liaw, Sok Ying
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2021, 34 (04) : 340 - 349