Association of robot-assisted techniques with the accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement: A network pooling analysis

被引:14
作者
Wei, Fei-Long [1 ]
Gao, Quan-You [1 ]
Heng, Wei [1 ]
Zhu, Kai-Long [1 ]
Yang, Fan [1 ]
Du, Ming-Rui [1 ]
Zhou, Cheng-Pei [1 ]
Qian, Ji-Xian [1 ]
Yan, Xiao-Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Tangdu Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, 569 Xinsi Rd, Xian 710038, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Accuracy; Safety; Cervical spinal surgery; Robot-assist; FACET JOINT VIOLATION; SPINE SURGERY; LUMBAR SPINE; INSERTION; FLUOROSCOPY; NAVIGATION; FIXATION; GUIDANCE; INSTRUMENTATION; COHORT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101421
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Traditional paired meta-analyses have yielded inconsistent results for the safety and effectiveness of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement due to the high heterogeneity within studies. This study evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement. Methods The Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were searched with no language limitations from inception to Jan 4, 2022. Odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to report results. The main outcomes were accuracy of pedicle screw placement, proximal facet joint violation, and complications. The study protocol was published in PROSPERO (CRD42022301417). Findings 26 trials including 2046 participants evaluating robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement were included in this study. Our pooled results showed that Renaissance (OR 2.86; [95% CI 1.79 to 4.57]) and TiRobot (OR 3.10; [95% CI 2.19 to 4.40]) yielded higher rates of perfect pedicle screw insertion (Grades A) than the conventional freehand technique. Renaissance (OR 2.82; [95% CI 1.51 to 5.25]) and TiRobot (OR 4.58; [95% CI 2.65 to 7.89]) yielded higher rates of clinically acceptable pedicle screw insertion (Grades A+B). However, ROSA, SpineAssist, and Orthobot were not associated with higher perfect pedicle screw insertion and clinically acceptable pedicle screw insertion rates. Robot-assisted techniques were associated with low rates of proximal facet joint violation (OR 0.18; [95% CI 0.10 to 0.32]; I2:9.55%) and overall complications (OR 0.38; [95% CI 0.23 to 0.63]; I2:27.05%). Moreover, robot-assisted techniques were associated with lower radiation doses (MD -14.38; [95% CI -25.62 to -3.13]; I2:100.00%). Interpretation Our findings suggest that only Renaissance and TiRobot systems are associated with high accuracy rates of pedicle screw placement. Robotic-assisted techniques hold great promise in spinal surgery due to their safety and effectiveness. Copyright (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease A META-ANALYSIS
    Li, W.
    Li, G.
    Chen, W.
    Cong, L.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2020, 9 (10): : 653 - 666
  • [22] Improved Accuracy of Cervical Spinal Surgery With Robot-Assisted Screw Insertion A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study
    Fan, Mingxing
    Liu, Yajun
    He, Da
    Han, Xiaoguang
    Zhao, Jingwei
    Duan, Fangfang
    Liu, Bo
    Tian, Wei
    SPINE, 2020, 45 (05) : 285 - 291
  • [23] Robotic-Assisted Versus Fluoroscopic-Guided Surgery on the Accuracy of Spine Pedicle Screw Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jung, Bongseok
    Han, Justin
    Shahsavarani, Shaya
    Abbas, Anas M.
    Echevarria, Alexandra C.
    Carrier, Robert E.
    Ngan, Alex
    Katz, Austen D.
    Essig, David
    Verma, Rohit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (02)
  • [24] Comparison of Superior-Level Facet Joint Violations Between Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement and Conventional Open Fluoroscopic-Guided Pedicle Screw Placement
    Zhang, Qi
    Xu, Yun-Feng
    Tian, Wei
    Le, Xiao-Feng
    Liu, Bo
    Liu, Ya-Jun
    He, Da
    Sun, Yu-Qin
    Yuan, Qiang
    Lang, Zhao
    Han, Xiao-Guang
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2019, 11 (05) : 850 - 856
  • [25] Accuracy and digital screw path design of TiRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement for lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Chen, Xu
    Li, Xing
    Yu, Zhengxi
    Zhang, Yanyan
    Lv, Jianhua
    Zhang, Huaizhi
    Wu, Yujun
    Lin, Haibin
    Dai, Jianhui
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2023, 47 (02) : 309 - 317
  • [26] Comparison of accuracy and safety between robot-assisted and conventional fluoroscope assisted placement of pedicle screws in thoracolumbar spine A meta-analysis
    Li, Chuntao
    Li, Wenyi
    Gao, Shangju
    Cao, Can
    Li, Changren
    He, Liang
    Ma, Xu
    Li, Meng
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (38)
  • [27] Robot assisted navigated drilling for percutaneous pedicle screw placement: A preliminary animal study
    Wang, Hongwei
    Zhou, Yue
    Liu, Jun
    Han, Jianda
    Xiang, Liangbi
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 49 (04) : 452 - 457
  • [28] Learning curve of junior surgeons in robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: a comparative cohort study
    Feng, Fan
    Chen, Xiuyuan
    Liu, Zude
    Han, Yingchao
    Chen, Hao
    Li, Quan
    Lao, Lifeng
    Shen, Hongxing
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 33 (1) : 314 - 323
  • [29] Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatima, Nida
    Massaad, Elie
    Hadzipasic, Muhamed
    Shankar, Ganesh M.
    Shin, John H.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [30] Accuracy of fluoroscopically-assisted pedicle screw placement: analysis of 1,218 screws in 198 patients
    Koktekir, Ender
    Ceylan, Davut
    Tatarli, Necati
    Karabagli, Hakan
    Recber, Fahri
    Akdemir, Gokhan
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (08) : 1702 - 1708