Transpiration response of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to drying soil in greenhouse conditions

被引:0
作者
Cominelli, Sofia [1 ]
Patrignani, Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN AGRONOMY | 2022年 / 4卷
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
soil water deficit; palmer amaranth; soil moisture; transpiration; soil water stress; WATER-DEFICIT; RESISTANCE; FIELD; INTERFERENCE; RUDIS; CORN;
D O I
10.3389/fagro.2022.1018251
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) is a troublesome weed that can result in substantial crop yield loss in irrigated and rainfed agricultural systems of the U.S. Great Plains. Knowledge of the transpiration response to soil drying is necessary to better understand the competitive nature of Palmer amaranth against crops in limiting soil moisture conditions. The objective was to quantify the soil matric potential at which the transpiration rate of Palmer amaranth starts to decline during soil drying conditions. A greenhouse experiment consisting of six replications of well-watered and stressed plants growing in columns of a packed silt loam soil on automated load cells was established in May 2021 in Manhattan, KS. Hourly transpiration rates were computed as the difference of two consecutive mass readings. Stomatal conductance was measured every other day on the topmost fully developed leaf using a leaf porometer. Soil matric potential was estimated using a measured soil water retention curve. The stomatal conductance of plants undergoing soil drying conditions started to decrease at a soil matric potential of -120 kPa and the plant-level transpiration rate started to decrease at -176 kPa. Palmer amaranth exhibited high (246 g h(-1)) day-time transpiration rates when soil water was available at low tension levels (10 to 33 kPa). In advanced stages of development, well-watered plants also exhibited nighttime transpiration that accounted for similar to 10% of the day-time transpiration total. Mean transpiration use efficiency of well-watered and stressed plants considering total dry biomass was similar (P = 0.247), with values of 10.9 and 11.6 g kg(-1), respectively. Overall, this study substantiates the competitive nature of Palmer amaranth for soil water in sub-humid and semi-arid environments and highlights the importance of early control of Palmer amaranth to minimize competition for soil moisture.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of plant growth stage and leaf aging on the response of transpiration and photosynthesis to water deficit in sunflower
    Andrianasolo, Fety Nambinina
    Casadebaig, Pierre
    Langlade, Nicolas
    Debaeke, Philippe
    Maury, Pierre
    [J]. FUNCTIONAL PLANT BIOLOGY, 2016, 43 (08) : 797 - 805
  • [2] Benjamin J.G., 2014, OPEN J SOIL SCI, V4, p151?160, DOI DOI 10.4236/OJSS.2014.44018
  • [3] Bensch CN, 2003, WEED SCI, V51, P37, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0037:IORPAR]2.0.CO
  • [4] 2
  • [5] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Competition for Water in Cotton
    Berger, Sarah T.
    Ferrell, Jason A.
    Rowland, Diane L.
    Webster, Theodore M.
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2015, 63 (04) : 928 - 935
  • [6] Amaranthus palmeri resistance and differential tolerance of Amaranthus palmeri and Amaranthus hybridus to ALS-inhibitor herbicides
    Burgos, NR
    Kuk, YI
    Talbert, RE
    [J]. PEST MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2001, 57 (05) : 449 - 457
  • [7] Campbell G., 2000, Introduction to environmental biophysics, V2nd
  • [8] CORLETT JE, 1994, PHYSIOL PLANTARUM, V92, P423, DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb08831.x
  • [9] Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia
    Culpepper, A. Stanley
    Grey, Timothy L.
    Vencill, William K.
    Kichler, Jeremy M.
    Webster, Theodore M.
    Brown, Steve M.
    York, Alan C.
    Davis, Jerry W.
    Hanna, Wayne W.
    [J]. WEED SCIENCE, 2006, 54 (04) : 620 - 626
  • [10] Plant response to mechanical resistance and air-filled porosity of soils under conventional and no-tillage system
    da Silva, AP
    Imhoff, S
    Kay, B
    [J]. SCIENTIA AGRICOLA, 2004, 61 (04): : 451 - 456