Foreign Body Reaction to Dialysis Chatheter and Peritoneal Fluid Eosinophilia in a Child on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

被引:3
|
作者
Cetin, Nuran [1 ]
Sav, Nadide Melike [1 ]
Ciftci, Evrim [1 ]
Yildiz, Bilal [1 ]
机构
[1] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat Nephrol, TR-26480 Eskisehir, Turkey
关键词
foreign body reaction; peritoneal effluent eosinophilia; eosinophilic peritonitis; peritoneal dialysis; child; BIOMATERIALS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Foreign body reaction is a tissue response against implanted materials. We described for the first time the eosinophilic peritonitis and foreign body giant cell reaction to dialysis catheter in a nonatopic child on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. We found tenderness, redness, and swelling without purulent discharge around the peritoneal catheter; increased eosinophil count in cloudy dialysis fluid; and blood and hyperechoic granulomatous formation appearance surrounding the peritoneal catheter on ultrasonography and foreign body giant cell reaction to dialysis catheter in pathologic examination of granulomatous lesionin in our patient. The peritoneal dialysis catheter was removed due to resistance to antibiotic and antihistamine treatments for suspected peritonitis and tunnel infection. Foreign body reaction and eosinophilic peritonitis with eosinophilic cloudy dialysis effluent can exist simultaneously. Foreign body reaction should be considered in the differential diagnosis of exit site and/or tunnel infection. Ultrasonography helps distinguish between foreign body reaction and exit-site or tunnel infection.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 321
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Extrapulmonary tuberculous infection manifested as peritoneal fluid eosinophilia in a continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patient
    Hsu, SC
    Lan, RR
    Tseng, CC
    Lai, CT
    Huang, JJ
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 15 (02) : 284 - 285
  • [2] INDUCTION OF PERITONEAL-FLUID EOSINOPHILIA BY INTRAPERITONEAL AIR IN PATIENTS ON CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS
    DAUGIRDAS, JT
    LEEHEY, DJ
    POPLI, S
    GANDHI, VC
    ZAYAS, I
    HOFFMAN, W
    ING, TS
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 313 (23): : 1481 - 1481
  • [3] Peritoneal calcification in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
    Richards, PJ
    Thompson, J
    Tucker, B
    Baker, LRI
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 1999, 51 (02) : 126 - 127
  • [4] PERITONEAL EOSINOPHILIA IN PATIENTS ON CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    CHAN, MK
    CHOW, L
    LAM, SS
    JONES, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1988, 11 (02) : 180 - 183
  • [5] Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: Are There Differences in Outcome?
    Dell'Aquila, R.
    Berlingo, G.
    Pellanda, M. V.
    Contestabile, A.
    PERITONEAL DIALYSIS - FROM BASIC CONCEPTS TO CLINICAL EXCELLENCE, 2009, 163 : 292 - 299
  • [6] Risk of Peritonitis in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis
    Cheng, Franco W. T.
    Chau, Marco
    Li, Xue
    Liang, Jiahao
    Wong, Ian Chi Kei
    Tang, Sydney C. W.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2024, 33 : 596 - 596
  • [7] Pathophysiology of peritoneal fluid eosinophilia in peritoneal dialysis patients
    Ejaz, AA
    Fitzpatrick, PM
    Durkin, AJ
    Wasiluk, A
    Haley, WE
    Goalen, MJ
    Ing, TS
    Zachariah, PK
    NEPHRON, 1999, 81 (02): : 125 - 130
  • [8] PERITONITIS WITH CONTINUOUS AMBULATORY PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS AND CONTINUOUS CYCLING PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS
    WARADY, BA
    CAMPOY, SF
    GROSS, SP
    SEDMAN, AB
    LUM, GM
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1984, 105 (05): : 726 - 730
  • [9] Ultrafiltration capacity and peritoneal fluid kinetics in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients
    Zhe, Xing-wei
    Tian, Xin-kui
    Cheng, Lei
    Wang, Tao
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2008, 32 (01) : 61 - 65
  • [10] Peritoneal calcification associated with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis
    Miller, FH
    DelaneySathy, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (03) : 541 - 542