Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Eyes with Previous Excimer Laser Surgery for Myopia A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

被引:33
作者
Pantanelli, Seth M. [1 ]
Lin, Charles C. [2 ]
Al-Mohtaseb, Zaina [3 ]
Rose-Nussbaumer, Jennifer R. [4 ,5 ]
Santhiago, Marcony R. [6 ]
Steigleman, Walter Allan, III [7 ]
Schallhorn, Julie M. [8 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Coll Med, Hershey, PA USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Byers Eye Inst, Palo Alto, CA USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif, Div Res, San Francisco, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Francis I Proctor Fdn, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[6] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[7] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[8] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Ophthalmol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
intraocular lens; cataract; LASIK; photorefractive keratectomy; myopia; IN-SITU KERATOMILEUSIS; CORNEAL REFRACTIVE SURGERY; TRUE-K FORMULA; CATARACT-SURGERY; ACCURACY; PREDICTION; COHERENCE; BIOMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.031
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To review the literature to evaluate the outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes with a history of myopic LASIK or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Methods: Literature searches were conducted in the PubMed database in January 2020. Separate searches relevant to cataract surgery outcomes and corneal refractive surgery returned 1169 and 162 relevant citations, respectively, and the full text of 24 was reviewed. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for this assessment; all were assigned a level III rating of evidence by the panel methodologist. Results: When automated keratometry was used with a theoretical formula designed for eyes without previous laser vision correction, the mean prediction error (MPE) was universally positive (hyperopic), the mean absolute errors (MAEs) and median absolute errors (MedAEs) were relatively high (0.72-1.9 diopters [D] and 0.65-1.73 D, respectively), and a low (8%-40%) proportion of eyes were within 0.5 D of target spherical equivalent (SE). Formulas developed specifically for this population requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction (i.e., clinical history, corneal bypass, and Feiz-Mannis) produced a proportion of eyes within 0.5 D of target SE between 26% and 44%. Formulas requiring only preoperative keratometry or no history at all had lower MAEs (0.42-0.94 D) and MedAEs (0.30-0.81 D) and higher (30%-68%) proportions within 0.5 D of target SE. Strategies that averaged several methods yielded the lowest reported MedAEs (0.31-0.35 D) and highest (66%-68%) proportions within 0.5 D of target SE. Even after using the best-known methods, refractive outcomes were less accurate in eyes that had previous excimer laser surgery for myopia compared with those that did not have it. Conclusions: Calculation methods requiring both prerefractive surgery keratometry and manifest refraction are no longer considered the gold standard. Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in eyes that had previous excimer laser surgery are less accurate than in eyes that did not. Patients should be advised of this refractive limitation when considering cataract surgery in the setting of previous corneal refractive surgery. Conclusions are limited by the small sample sizes and retrospective nature of nearly all existing literature in this domain. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 792
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Intraoperative Refractive Biometry for Predicting Intraocular Lens Power Calculation after Prior Myopic Refractive Surgery
    Ianchulev, Tsontcho
    Hoffer, Kenneth J.
    Yoo, Sonia H.
    Chang, David F.
    Breen, Michael
    Padrick, Thomas
    Tran, Dan B.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 121 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [22] Intraocular lens prediction accuracy after corneal refractive surgery using K values from 3 devices
    Kim, Eun Chul
    Cho, Kyongjin
    Hwang, Ho Sik
    Hwang, Kyu Yeon
    Kim, Man Soo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 39 (11) : 1640 - 1646
  • [23] Koch DD, 2007, ASCRS S CAT IOL REFR
  • [24] Intraocular lens calculations after refractive surgery
    Latkany, RA
    Chokshi, AR
    Speaker, MG
    Abramson, J
    Soloway, BD
    Yu, GP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 31 (03) : 562 - 570
  • [25] Repeatability and comparability of keratometry measurements obtained with swept-source optical coherence and combined dual Scheimpflug-Placido disk-based tomography
    Lu, Amy Q.
    Poulsen, Anne
    Cui, David
    Seeger, Catherine
    Lehman, Erik
    Scott, Ingrid U.
    Pantanelli, Seth M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 46 (12) : 1637 - 1643
  • [26] Simple regression formula for intraocular lens power adjustment in eyes requiring cataract surgery after excimer laser photoablation
    Masket, S
    Masket, SE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 32 (03) : 430 - 434
  • [27] Intraocular Lens Power Calculations after Myopic Laser Refractive Surgery: A Comparison of Methods in 173 Eyes
    McCarthy, Martin
    Gavanski, Gregory M.
    Paton, Katherine E.
    Holland, Simon P.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (05) : 940 - 944
  • [28] Update on Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas
    Melles, Ronald B.
    Kane, Jack X.
    Olsen, Thomas
    Chang, William J.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 126 (09) : 1334 - 1335
  • [29] Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas
    Melles, Ronald B.
    Holladay, Jack T.
    Chang, William J.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 125 (02) : 169 - 178
  • [30] Refractive predictability and visual outcomes of an extended range of vision intraocular lens in eyes with previous myopic laser in situ keratomileusis
    Palomino-Bautista, Carlos
    Carmona-Gonzalez, David
    Sanchez-Jean, Ruben
    Castillo-Gomez, Alfredo
    Romero-Dominguez, Marta
    Elias de Tejada, Macarena
    Pinero, David P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 29 (06) : 593 - 599