When Small Words Foretell Academic Success: The Case of College Admissions Essays

被引:350
作者
Pennebaker, James W. [1 ]
Chung, Cindy K. [1 ]
Frazee, Joey [1 ]
Lavergne, Gary M. [1 ]
Beaver, David I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0115844
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The smallest and most commonly used words in English are pronouns, articles, and other function words. Almost invisible to the reader or writer, function words can reveal ways people think and approach topics. A computerized text analysis of over 50,000 college admissions essays from more than 25,000 entering students found a coherent dimension of language use based on eight standard function word categories. The dimension, which reflected the degree students used categorical versus dynamic language, was analyzed to track college grades over students' four years of college. Higher grades were associated with greater article and preposition use, indicating categorical language (i.e., references to complexly organized objects and concepts). Lower grades were associated with greater use of auxiliary verbs, pronouns, adverbs, conjunctions, and negations, indicating more dynamic language (i.e., personal narratives). The links between the categorical-dynamic index (CDI) and academic performance hint at the cognitive styles rewarded by higher education institutions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SECRET LIFE PRONOUNS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines: Methods, Theory and Algorithms
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007
[4]  
Atkinson R.C., 2001, STANDARDIZED TESTS A
[5]  
Biber Douglas., 1988, Variation across speech and writing, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511621024
[6]   Dynamic memory revisited [J].
Graesser, AC ;
Whitten, SN .
CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY-APA REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2001, 46 (03) :261-262
[7]  
Heylighen F., 2002, Found Sci, V7, P293, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1019661126744
[8]  
Jurafsky D, 2009, P HUM LANG TECHN 200, P638, DOI DOI 10.3115/1620754.1620847
[9]  
Landauer T. K., 2003, Assess. Educ. Princ. Policy Pract, V10, P295, DOI DOI 10.1080/0969594032000148154
[10]  
Larkey L. S., 1998, Proceedings of the 21st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, P90, DOI 10.1145/290941.290965