Assessing Granger Causality on Irregular Missing and Extreme Data

被引:3
作者
Zanin, Massimiliano [1 ]
机构
[1] UIB, CSIC, IFISC, Inst Fis Interdisciplinar & Sistemas Complejos, Campus UIB, Palma De Mallorca 07122, Spain
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2021年 / 9卷
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Time series analysis; Standards; Europe; Couplings; Pollution measurement; Dynamics; Predictive models; Granger causality; missing data; functional networks; BRAIN NETWORKS; INFERENCE; EXPORTS; MODELS; GROWTH; PANEL;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3082014
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The Granger test is one of the best known techniques to detect causality relationships among time series, and has been used uncountable times in science and engineering. The quality of its results strongly depends on the quality of the underlying data, and different approaches have been proposed to reduce the impact of, for instance, observational noise or irregular sampling. Less attention has nevertheless been devoted to situations in which the analysed time series are irregularly polluted with missing and extreme values. In this contribution I tackle this problem by comparing four different data pre-processing strategies and evaluating their performance with synthetic time series, both in dyadic tests and functional network contexts. I further apply these strategies to a real-world problem, involving inferring the structure behind the propagation of delays in an air transport system. Finally, some guidelines are provided on when and how these strategies ought to be used.
引用
收藏
页码:75362 / 75374
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neural Granger Causality
    Tank, Alex
    Covert, Ian
    Foti, Nicholas
    Shojaie, Ali
    Fox, Emily B.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 44 (08) : 4267 - 4279
  • [2] Testing for Granger causality in panel data
    Lopez, Luciano
    Weber, Sylvain
    STATA JOURNAL, 2017, 17 (04) : 972 - 984
  • [3] Granger causality revisited
    Friston, Karl J.
    Bastos, Andre M.
    Oswal, Ashwini
    van Wijk, Bernadette
    Richter, Craig
    Litvak, Vladimir
    NEUROIMAGE, 2014, 101 : 796 - 808
  • [4] Testing subspace Granger causality
    Al-Sadoon, Majid M.
    ECONOMETRICS AND STATISTICS, 2019, 9 : 42 - 61
  • [5] The MVGC multivariate Granger causality toolbox: A new approach to Granger-causal inference
    Barnett, Lionel
    Seth, Anil K.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2014, 223 : 50 - 68
  • [6] Assessing Thalamocortical Functional Connectivity With Granger Causality
    Chen, Cheng
    Maybhate, Anil
    Israel, David
    Thakor, Nitish V.
    Jia, Xiaofeng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2013, 21 (05) : 725 - 733
  • [7] A GENERAL STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK FOR ASSESSING GRANGER CAUSALITY
    Kim, Sanggyun
    Brown, Emery N.
    2010 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2010, : 2222 - 2225
  • [8] Quantile Granger causality in the presence of instability☆
    Mayer, Alexander
    Wied, Dominik
    Troster, Victor
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2025, 249
  • [9] Exact recovery of Granger causality graphs with unconditional pairwise tests
    Kinnear, R. J.
    Mazumdar, R. R.
    NETWORK SCIENCE, 2023, 11 (03) : 431 - 457
  • [10] Dynamics on networks: assessing functional connectivity with Granger causality
    Yonghong Chen
    Steven L. Bressler
    Mingzhou Ding
    Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 2009, 15 : 329 - 350