Theory-based approach to developing an implementation plan to support the adoption of a patient decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening

被引:3
作者
Agbadje, Titilayo Tatiana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Menear, Matthew [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Legare, France [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Laval Univ, Canada Res Chair Shared Decis Making & Knowledge, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Ctr Rech Sante Durable VITAM, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Ctr Integre Univ Sante & Serv Sociaux Capitale Na, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Laval, Fac Nursing, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
Decision aid; Shared decision making; Implementation plan; Knowledge-to-Action Framework; Theoretical Domains Framework; Participatory action research; IPDAS; THEORETICAL DOMAINS FRAMEWORK; HEALTH-CARE; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; INFORMED CHOICE; BEHAVIOR-CHANGE; PREGNANT-WOMEN; PROFESSIONALS; VALIDATION; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1186/s13012-021-01103-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Our team has developed a decision aid to help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions about Down syndrome prenatal screening. However, the decision aid is not yet widely available in Quebec's prenatal care pathways. Objective We sought to identify knowledge translation strategies and develop an implementation plan to promote the use of the decision aid in prenatal care services in Quebec, Canada. Methods Guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and the Theoretical Domains Framework, we performed a synthesis of our research (11 publications) on prenatal screening in Quebec and on the decision aid. Two authors independently reviewed the 11 articles, extracted information, and mapped it onto the Knowledge-to-Action framework. Using participatory action research methods, we then recruited pregnant women, health professionals, managers of three prenatal care services, and researchers to (a) identify the different clinical pathways followed by pregnant women and (b) select knowledge translation strategies for a clinical implementation plan. Then, based on all the information gathered, the authors established a consensus on strategies to include in the plan. Results Our knowledge synthesis showed that pregnant women and their partners are not sufficiently involved in the decision-making process about prenatal screening and that there are numerous barriers and facilitators of the use of the decision aid in clinical practice (e.g., low intention to use it among health providers). Using a participatory action approach, we met with five pregnant women, three managers, and six health professionals. They informed us about three of Quebec's prenatal care pathways and helped us identify 20 knowledge translation strategies (e.g., nurse discusses decision aid with women before they meet the doctor) to include in a clinical implementation plan. The research team reached a consensus about the clinical plan and also about broader organizational strategies, such as training healthcare providers in the use of the decision aid, monitoring its impact (e.g., measure decisional conflict) and sustaining its use (e.g., engage key stakeholders in the implementation process). Conclusion Next steps are to pilot our implementation plan while further identifying global strategies that target institutional, policy, and systemic supports for implementation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Pregnant women's views on how to promote the use of a decision aid for Down syndrome prenatal screening: a theory-informed qualitative study
    Agbadje, Titilayo Tatiana
    Menear, Matthew
    Dugas, Michele
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Rahimi, Samira Abbasgholizadeh
    Robitaille, Hubert
    Giguere, Anik M. C.
    Rousseau, Francois
    Wilson, Brenda J.
    Legare, France
    [J]. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2018, 18
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, CHAIR PROMOTING SHAR
  • [3] A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems
    Atkins, Lou
    Francis, Jill
    Islam, Rafat
    O'Connor, Denise
    Patey, Andrea
    Ivers, Noah
    Foy, Robbie
    Duncan, Eilidh M.
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Lawton, Rebecca
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2017, 12
  • [4] Shared Decision Making - The Pinnacle of Patient-Centered Care
    Barry, Michael J.
    Edgman-Levitan, Susan
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (09) : 780 - 781
  • [5] Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome
    Bekker, HL
    Hewison, J
    Thornton, JG
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) : 323 - 329
  • [6] Validation of a decision regret scale
    Brehaut, JC
    O'Connor, AM
    Wood, TJ
    Hack, TF
    Siminoff, L
    Gordon, E
    Feldman-Stewart, D
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) : 281 - 292
  • [7] Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research
    Cane, James
    O'Connor, Denise
    Michie, Susan
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2012, 7
  • [8] Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care. Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC), EPOC TAXONOMY
  • [9] Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Aron, David C.
    Keith, Rosalind E.
    Kirsh, Susan R.
    Alexander, Jeffery A.
    Lowery, Julie C.
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2009, 4
  • [10] Health literacy in pregnant women facing prenatal screening may explain their intention to use a patient decision aid: A short report
    Delanoë A.
    Lépine J.
    Leiva Portocarrero M.E.
    Robitaille H.
    Turcotte S.
    Lévesque I.
    Wilson B.J.
    Giguère A.M.C.
    Légaré F.
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 9 (1)