Fire risk assessment method under the technical building code

被引:2
作者
Carlos Perez-Martin, Jose [1 ]
Diaz-Diaz, Rafael [2 ]
Santos-Garcia, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Ayuntamiento Madrid, Madrid 28016, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETSI Ind, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
来源
DYNA | 2010年 / 85卷 / 04期
关键词
fire; evaluation method; risk; protection; danger; safety; Spanish building code; performance based design;
D O I
10.6036/3437
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The high complexity of measuring and comparing the risk level of performance based design allowed by the Spanish Building Code (GE) and the lack of Spanish legislation on the matter makes a fire risk evaluation tool highly useful guiding the projectist and the control authority over the feasibility of these complicated projects. A Fire Risk Evaluation Method within the frame of the Spanish Building Code (MEREDICTE) has been developed trying to balance input sources, simplicity and clearness in its use. The number of parameters implied guarantees sound, exhaustive and reliable outputs. MEREDICTE is made of 73 parameters: 31 calculate potential risk and 42 obtain protection level. In an orientative way, MEREDICTE's parameters triple those of the most referred and extended evaluation method: the Gretener Method. The article shows the MEREDICTE technique and foundations, the methodology used in its investigation and development, its most significant innovation and its possible applications. Regarding the protection level, its formulation and application are referred to the Windsor building of Madrid comparing the results obtained on the building as it was when it was devastated by the fire of February 2005 and whether it fulfilled the Spanish building code conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 314
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Specific knowledge in assessment of local fire for design of building structures [J].
Pokorný, Jiří ;
Kučera, Petr ;
Vlček, Vladimír .
Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 1001 :362-367
[42]   Earthquake risk assessment of building structures [J].
Ellingwood, BR .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 74 (03) :251-262
[43]   Integrating geospatial information into fire risk assessment [J].
Chuvieco, E. ;
Aguado, I. ;
Jurdao, S. ;
Pettinari, M. L. ;
Yebra, M. ;
Salas, J. ;
Hantson, S. ;
de la Riva, J. ;
Ibarra, P. ;
Rodrigues, M. ;
Echeverria, M. ;
Azqueta, D. ;
Roman, M. V. ;
Bastarrika, A. ;
Martinez, S. ;
Recondo, C. ;
Zapico, E. ;
Martinez-Vega, F. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2014, 23 (05) :606-619
[44]   Energy-based damage assessment method for masonry walls under seismic and fire loads [J].
Tao, Yuxuan ;
Xu, Zhao-Dong ;
Wei, Yaxin ;
Miao, Changqing ;
Ji, Bohai .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2025, 322
[45]   Fire Risk Assessment of Subway Stations Based on Combination Weighting of Game Theory and TOPSIS Method [J].
Ju, Weiyi ;
Wu, Jie ;
Kang, Qingchun ;
Jiang, Juncheng ;
Xing, Zhixiang .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (12)
[46]   Fire and explosion risk assessment for large-scale oil export terminal [J].
Shebeko, Yu. N. ;
Bolodian, I. A. ;
Molchanov, V. P. ;
Deshevih, Yu. I. ;
Gordlenko, D. M. ;
Smolin, I. M. ;
Kirillov, D. S. .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2007, 20 (4-6) :651-658
[47]   FIRE RISK ASSESSMENT OF PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS BASED ON THE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECTS ANALYSIS [J].
Zamrazilova, Michaela ;
Oulehlova, Alena .
AD ALTA-JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH, 2022, 12 (02) :181-185
[48]   Quantitative risk assessment of fire & explosion for regasification process of an LNG-FSRU [J].
Lee, Sangick .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 197
[49]   A new method for risk assessment in industrial processes [J].
Falcone, D. ;
Di Bona, G. ;
Forcina .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (19) :1-6
[50]   Risk assessment method based on fuzzy logic [J].
Zhao, Yuan ;
Jiao, Jian ;
Zhao, Ting-Di .
Xi Tong Gong Cheng Yu Dian Zi Ji Shu/Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2015, 37 (08) :1825-1831