Fire risk assessment method under the technical building code

被引:2
作者
Carlos Perez-Martin, Jose [1 ]
Diaz-Diaz, Rafael [2 ]
Santos-Garcia, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Ayuntamiento Madrid, Madrid 28016, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, ETSI Ind, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
来源
DYNA | 2010年 / 85卷 / 04期
关键词
fire; evaluation method; risk; protection; danger; safety; Spanish building code; performance based design;
D O I
10.6036/3437
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The high complexity of measuring and comparing the risk level of performance based design allowed by the Spanish Building Code (GE) and the lack of Spanish legislation on the matter makes a fire risk evaluation tool highly useful guiding the projectist and the control authority over the feasibility of these complicated projects. A Fire Risk Evaluation Method within the frame of the Spanish Building Code (MEREDICTE) has been developed trying to balance input sources, simplicity and clearness in its use. The number of parameters implied guarantees sound, exhaustive and reliable outputs. MEREDICTE is made of 73 parameters: 31 calculate potential risk and 42 obtain protection level. In an orientative way, MEREDICTE's parameters triple those of the most referred and extended evaluation method: the Gretener Method. The article shows the MEREDICTE technique and foundations, the methodology used in its investigation and development, its most significant innovation and its possible applications. Regarding the protection level, its formulation and application are referred to the Windsor building of Madrid comparing the results obtained on the building as it was when it was devastated by the fire of February 2005 and whether it fulfilled the Spanish building code conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 314
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Fire Safety Risk Assessment of Workplace Facilities: A Case Study [J].
Hassanain, Mohammad A. ;
Al-Harogi, Mohammed ;
Ibrahim, Ahmed M. .
FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 8
[32]   Assessment on liquid Li fire risk under humid air condition and with heat insulators [J].
Kenjo, Shunsuke ;
Oyaidzu, Makoto ;
Obata, Kazuhiro ;
Ochiai, Kentaro ;
Sato, Satoshi .
NUCLEAR MATERIALS AND ENERGY, 2024, 38
[33]   Fire risk assessment for ship compartments [J].
Sobral, J. ;
Guedes Soares, C. .
MARITIME TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING 3, VOLS 1-2, 2016, :895-902
[34]   Risk Assessment and Managing Technical Systems in case of Mining Industry [J].
Radosavljevic, Slobodan ;
Lilic, Nikola ;
Curcic, Srecko ;
Radosavljevic, Milan .
STROJNISKI VESTNIK-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 55 (02) :119-130
[35]   Development of a model to generate a risk map in a building fire [J].
Chu YanYan ;
Zhang Hui ;
Shen ShiFei ;
Yang Rui ;
Qiao LiFeng .
SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 53 (10) :2739-2747
[36]   Fire Risk Assessment Method of Energy Storage Power Station Based on Cloud Model [J].
Xu, Mingwei ;
Li, Ran ;
Yao, Haifei ;
Hou, Zhiqiang ;
Liu, Yutong ;
Dai, Chao ;
Wang, Ruiqi ;
Liu, Guanlin ;
Yang, Shangxue ;
Li, Yage .
JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 20 (03) :395-401
[37]   The regression and innovation of building fire proofing design method [J].
Fu, BenChen ;
Fei, Teng .
STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED RISK MANAGEMENT, 2007, :516-519
[38]   Fire Probabilistic Risk Assessment and its Applications in the Nuclear Power Industry [J].
Clarence Worrell ;
Christopher Rochon .
Fire Technology, 2016, 52 :443-467
[39]   Building code for Bogota: assessment and update proposal in a sustainability framework [J].
Escallon Gartner, Clemencia ;
Villate Matiz, Camilo .
CUADERNOS DE VIVIENDA Y URBANISMO, 2013, 6 (12) :248-259
[40]   Postfire Damage Assessment of a Steel Industrial Building Exposed to Fire [J].
Ozakgul, Kadir ;
Baydogan, Murat ;
Piroglu, Filiz .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2023, 37 (06)