The Effect of the Sequence of Creative Processes on the Quality of the Ideas: The Benefit of a Simultaneous Focus on Originality and Feasibility

被引:16
作者
Baruah, Jonali [1 ]
Paulus, Paul B. [2 ]
Kohn, Nicholas W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tarleton State Univ, Stephenville, TX USA
[2] Univ Texas Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[3] Mitre Corp, Mclean, VA USA
关键词
creativity; innovation; idea refinement; elaboration; brainstorming; task framing; BRAINSTORMING GROUPS; PRODUCTIVITY; ELABORATION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1002/jocb.500
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
A major challenge in the process of innovation is to generate quality products that are original as well as feasible, because these features are associated with contradictory cognitive thought processes. This study investigated whether opportunities to engage in an idea generation, selection, and subsequent refinement with a simultaneous focus on originality and feasibility would enhance innovation. Experiment 1 examined whether a linear focus or a simultaneous focus on feasibility and originality in the process of first generating ideas and then refining them enhanced the overall quality of ideas. The simultaneous focus resulted in the highest originality and elaboration of ideas. Experiment 2 involved four stages of innovation-generation, selection, and two refinement phases-with a varied order of focus in the two refinement phases. Consistent with a dialectical approach to creativity, an iterative focus on feasibility and originality in the refinement phase was most beneficial in enhancing the quality of the ideas. The extent of idea elaboration played a mediation role in the development of ideas during the refinement phase of innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 961
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1963, Applied imagination
[2]   The Role of Time and Category Relatedness in Electronic Brainstorming [J].
Baruah, Jonali ;
Paulus, Paul B. .
SMALL GROUP RESEARCH, 2016, 47 (03) :333-342
[3]   The primal mark: How the beginning shapes the end in the development of creative ideas [J].
Berg, Justin M. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2014, 125 (01) :1-17
[4]  
Bledow R., 2009, IND ORGAN PSYCHOL-US, V2, P305, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01154.x
[5]   THE ROLE OF SOCIAL ANXIOUSNESS IN GROUP BRAINSTORMING [J].
CAMACHO, LM ;
PAULUS, PB .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (06) :1071-1080
[6]  
CICCHETTI DV, 1981, AM J MENT DEF, V86, P127
[7]   Divergent and Convergent Group Creativity in an Asynchronous Online Environment [J].
Coursey, Lauren E. ;
Williams, Belinda C. ;
Kenworthy, Jared B. ;
Paulus, Paul B. ;
Doboli, Simona .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2020, 54 (02) :253-266
[8]   Linking the Divergent and Convergent Processes of Collaborative Creativity: The Impact of Expertise Levels and Elaboration Processes [J].
Coursey, Lauren E. ;
Gertner, Ryan T. ;
Williams, Belinda C. ;
Kenworthy, Jared B. ;
Paulus, Paul B. ;
Doboli, Simona .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
[9]   Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making [J].
De Dreu, Carsten K. W. ;
Nijstad, Bernard A. ;
van Knippenberg, Daan .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2008, 12 (01) :22-49
[10]   Scientific Creativity: Divergent and Convergent Thinking and the Impact of Culture [J].
de Vries, Herie B. ;
Lubart, Todd I. .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2019, 53 (02) :145-155