Life cycle embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings: A comparison between different LCI methodologies

被引:34
作者
Venkatraj, V. [1 ]
Dixit, M. K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Architecture, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Construct Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
Embodied energy; Operating energy; Life cycle energy; Educational buildings; Trade-offs; Renovation; Hybrid method; SIMULATION-BASED OPTIMIZATION; BIM-BASED FRAMEWORK; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; OFFICE BUILDINGS; PERFORMANCE; CHALLENGES; RETROFIT; QUANTIFICATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2021.110957
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nearly half of the global annual energy supply is consumed by the building construction sector, indicating an enormous potential to minimize the carbon footprint. During its life cycle, a building consumes energy in the form of embodied and operational energy. Embodied energy (EE) is expended in processes during construction (ex: extraction of raw material, transportation, manufacturing, etc.). Operating energy (OE) is spent on operating and maintaining the building to ensure occupant comfort. Unlike OE, the methods used to calculate EE are complex, unstandardized, and time-consuming. Each EE calculation method utilizes different sources of data and system boundary definitions, therefore making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate building life cycle energy (LCE). Literature suggests that the disaggregated input-output based hybrid (IOH) approach is more accurate, complete, and reliable in comparison to the other EE calculation methods. In this study, we examine the EE-OE relationship by calculating EE factors for a newly constructed and renovated educational building. Next, we also compare the variation in EE factors across different life cycle inventory (LCI) methods (process-based, aggregated IOH, and disaggregated IOH). The results of this study indicate that using different LCI techniques to calculate EE causes massive variations in EE factors, which represent the EE expense of saving one unit of OE. The findings of our study and literature review show that the process-based approach underestimates EE, therefore the values of EE factors calculated using this approach need to be interpreted with caution. These results further elucidate the importance of standardizing the EE calculation method.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]  
Abate D., 2009, WHITESTONE FACILITY
[2]  
Acquaye A., 2010, THESIS
[3]   A review on simulation-based optimization methods applied to building performance analysis [J].
Anh-Tuan Nguyen ;
Reiter, Sigrid ;
Rigo, Philippe .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2014, 113 :1043-1058
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, A National Green Building Research Agenda
[5]   Building energy performance: A LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board [J].
Ardente, Fulvio ;
Beccali, Marco ;
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Mistretta, Marina .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2008, 40 (01) :1-10
[6]  
ASHRAE A, 2016, ASHRAE IES STAND 90
[7]   Embodied energy of buildings: A review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends [J].
Azari, Rahman ;
Abbasabadi, Narjes .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 168 :225-235
[8]   Multi-objective optimization of building envelope design for life cycle environmental performance [J].
Azari, Rahman ;
Garshasbi, Samira ;
Amini, Pegah ;
Rashed-Ali, Hazem ;
Mohammadi, Yousef .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2016, 126 :524-534
[9]  
Balouktsi M., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V588, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032023
[10]  
Baum M., 2007, GREEN BUILDING RES F