Ambu AuraOnce versus i-gel laryngeal mask airway in infants and children undergoing surgical procedures A randomized controlled trial

被引:9
|
作者
Alzahem, Abdulrahman M. [1 ]
Aqil, Mansoor [2 ]
Alzahrani, Tariq A. [2 ]
Aljazaeri, Ayman H. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, King Saud Univ Med City, Dept Pediat Surg, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, King Saud Univ Med City, Dept Anesthesiol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY; ANESTHETIZED PATIENTS; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; VENTILATED CHILDREN; PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS; COHORT EVALUATION; SCORING SYSTEM; INSERTION; LMA-CLASSIC(TM); PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.15537/smj.2017.5.17960
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and performance of the pediatric Ambu AuraOnce (Ambu AO) mask (Ambu, Copenhagen, Denmark) and i-gel mask (Intersurgical Ltd., Wokingham, United Kingdom). Methods: From May 2015 to September 2016, 112 patients, 0-14 years old, underwent elective surgery at a tertiary university hospital (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia). They were randomly assigned to the Ambu AO or i-gel group. Three groups underwent a subgroup analysis: <= 5 kg (group 1), 5.1-10.0 kg (group 2), and >10 kg (group 3). Results: The oropharyngeal leak pressure was significantly higher for the i-gel (25.4 +/- 4.1 cm H2O) than for the Ambu AO (22.5 +/- 3.9 cm H2O, p<0.001). The Ambu AO had a slightly higher ease of insertion compared to the i-gel (100% versus 94%, p=0.08) and required less manipulation (2% versus 11%, p=0.07). The Ambu AO and i-gel showed non-significant differences in performance between weight groups. There were statistically significant differences for higher leak pressure in group 2 (p=0.01) and group 3 (p=0.002) in favor of the i-gel, and for less manipulation in the Ambu AO in group 1 (p=0.04). Fiberoptic viewing was superior in group 2 for the i-gel (p=0.03) and in group 3 for the Ambu AO (p=0.02). Conclusion: Both devices demonstrated equally good performance with low morbidity. The Ambu AO had a statistical tendency towards easier insertion and less manipulation. Confirming this finding will require large scale trials.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 490
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical Performance of I-gel versus Ambu AuraGain in Paediatric Patients undergoing General Anaesthesia: A Randomised Clinical Study
    Grewal, Tejinderpal kaur
    Kumar, Parmod
    Dhamija, Reeva
    Kaur, Simrit
    Kaur, Gurlivleen
    Kundra, Tanveer singh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (11) : UC27 - UC32
  • [32] The comparison of ProSeal and I-gel laryngeal mask airways in anesthetized adult patients under controlled ventilation
    Ekinci, Osman
    Abitagaoglu, Suheyla
    Turan, Guldem
    Sivrikaya, Zubeyir
    Bosna, Gulsen
    Ozgultekin, Asu
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (04) : 432 - 436
  • [33] Safety and Limitation of the I-gel Laryngeal mask airway in the Lithotomy Position. An Observational study
    Kamel, Walid Y.
    Haggag, Addham Magdy
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [34] Comparison of fibrescope guided intubation via the classic laryngeal mask airway and i-gel in a manikin
    de Lloyd, L.
    Hodzovic, I.
    Voisey, S.
    Wilkes, A. R.
    Latto, I. P.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 65 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [35] Emergency airway management by paramedics: comparison between standard endotracheal intubation, laryngeal mask airway, and I-gel
    Leventis, Charalampos
    Chalkias, Athanasios
    Sampanis, Michail A.
    Foulidou, Xanthipi
    Xanthos, Theodoros
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (05) : 371 - 373
  • [36] Comparison of the clinical performance of i-gel and Ambu AuraGain in children A randomised noninferiority clinical trial
    Mihara, Takahiro
    Nakayama, Rika
    Ka, Koui
    Goto, Takahisa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (06) : 411 - 417
  • [37] Comparing I-Gel to Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airways in Infants: A Prospective Randomised Clinical Study
    Oba, Sibel
    Turk, Hacer Sebnem
    Kilinc, Leyla
    Karaci, Birsen Eksioglu
    Islamoglu, Serkan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2020, 48 (04) : 308 - 313
  • [38] A randomized comparison of the i-gel™ with the self-pressurized air-Q™ intubating laryngeal airway in children
    Kim, Min-Soo
    Lee, Jae Hoon
    Han, Sang Won
    Im, Young Jae
    Kang, Hyo Jong
    Lee, Jeong-Rim
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2015, 25 (04) : 405 - 412
  • [39] A comparison of the i-gel™ and the PRO-Breathe® laryngeal mask during pressure support ventilation in children
    Drake-Brockman, T. F. E.
    Ledowski, T.
    Hegarty, M.
    Gessner, M.
    von Ungern-Sternberg, B. S.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 70 (12) : 1412 - 1417
  • [40] I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway Combined with Tracheal Intubation Attenuate Systemic Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Posterior Fossa Surgery
    Tang, Chaoliang
    Chai, Xiaoqing
    Kang, Fang
    Huang, Xiang
    Hou, Tao
    Tang, Fei
    Li, Juan
    MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION, 2015, 2015