A systematic review of solar photovoltaic energy systems design modelling, algorithms, and software

被引:24
作者
Kazem, Hussein A. [1 ,2 ]
Chaichan, Miqdam T. [3 ]
Al-Waeli, Ali H. A. [2 ,4 ]
Gholami, Aslan [5 ]
机构
[1] Sohar Univ, Fac Engn, Sohar, Oman
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Solar Energy Res Inst, Bangi, Malaysia
[3] Univ Technol Baghdad, Energy & Renewable Energies Technol Res Ctr, Baghdad, Iraq
[4] Amer Univ Iraq, Engn Dept, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Regio, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Mech & Energy Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Photovoltaic software; PV system design; PV models and approaches; PV algorithms; HYBRID POWER-SYSTEM; LIFE-CYCLE COST; WATER DESALINATION SYSTEM; TECHNOECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION; HOUSING ELECTRIFICATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE DESIGN; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; OPTIMAL ALLOCATION; PV/T SYSTEMS; WIND;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2022.2100517
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Solar energy and photovoltaic (PV) systems became an essential part of the global energy profile. The PV systems are designed using different configurations such as standalone, grid-connected, and tracking. However, PV systems could be added to other renewable energy systems or nonrenewable energy systems such as wind turbines and diesel generators, respectively. In this context, designers, researchers, and engineers working to find the optimum design fitting the electrical load in terms of technical, economic, environmental, and social aspects. Many software, models, and algorithms were invented and proposed to help to find the optimum PV sizing and design. In this paper, a comprehensive review was conducted to describe, evaluate, and compare most of the software (36 software were considered), models, and algorithms used to design PV systems in the past eight decades. It is found that PV system design optimization tools developed with time and needs. Different classifications are used for design software, sometimes as classical and artificial or single and hybrid algorithms. However, hybrid algorithms became the most used algorithm due to their flexibility and ability to deal with complex problems. Also, comparison and critical review are presented, and a case study is given in this paper. It is found that REPS.OM software results are closer to the case study experimental results compared with HOMER software with less than 7% variation between the two software. The review presented in this paper provides useful information to identify PV system design software suitable for the user application.
引用
收藏
页码:6709 / 6736
页数:28
相关论文
共 131 条
  • [91] Optimal allocation and sizing of PV/Wind/Split-diesel/Battery hybrid energy system for minimizing life cycle cost, carbon emission and dump energy of remote residential building
    Ogunjuyigbe, A. S. O.
    Ayodele, T. R.
    Akinola, O. A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 171 : 153 - 171
  • [92] Determination of reliability constrained optimal resource mix for an autonomous hybrid power system using Particle Swarm Optimization
    Paliwal, Priyanka
    Patidar, N. P.
    Nema, R. K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 63 : 194 - 204
  • [93] Validation of a simplified PV simulation engine
    Perez, R
    Reed, R
    Hoff, T
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2004, 77 (04) : 357 - 362
  • [94] Maximizing PV peak shaving with solar load control: validation of a web-based economic evaluation tool
    Perez, R
    Hoff, T
    Herig, C
    Shah, J
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2003, 74 (05) : 409 - 415
  • [95] Petrana S., 2018, E3S WEB C, V02048, P1
  • [96] Pöchacker M, 2014, 2014 IEEE INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES - ASIA (ISGT ASIA), P278, DOI 10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2014.6873803
  • [97] Irradiance calculation on shaded surfaces
    Quaschning, V
    Hanitsch, R
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 1998, 62 (05) : 369 - 375
  • [98] Techno-economical optimization of hybrid pv/wind/battery system using Neuro-Fuzzy
    Rajkumar, R. K.
    Ramachandaramurthy, V. K.
    Yong, B. L.
    Chia, D. B.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2011, 36 (08) : 5148 - 5153
  • [99] Rezaei S.H., 2009, ESTEC, P1
  • [100] Rezaei S.H., 2009, 3 INT C SOLAR AIR CO, P1