A Pictorial Review of PI-RADS v2.0 and PI-RADS v2.1: What Changed?

被引:0
|
作者
Gibson, Nicolas [1 ]
Fung, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta Hosp, Dept Radiol & Diagnost Imaging, 8440 112 St NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
关键词
PI-RADS v2; 0; 1; Prostate Imaging;
D O I
10.1097/01.CDR.0000802024.06098.86
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer among Canadian men (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) and is the third leading cause of death from cancer in men in Canada. It is estimated that, in 2020, 23,300 men will be diagnosed with PCa, representing 20% of all new cancer cases in men.1 The recommended technique being used for the detection and risk stratification of PCa is multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which includes high-resolution T2-weighted (T2W) images to depict prostate anatomy and two functional MRI techniques, including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to display cell density and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE) that shows vascularity.2
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How does PI-RADS v2.1 impact patient classification? A head-to-head comparison between PI-RADS v2.0 and v2.1
    Linhares Moreira, Ana Sofia
    De Visschere, Pieter
    Van Praet, Charles
    Villeirs, Geert
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (06) : 839 - 847
  • [2] Evaluation of prostate volume in mpMRI: comparison of the recommendations of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1
    Gundogdu, Elif
    Emekli, Emre
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [3] PI-RADS v2.1: moving towards clarity (comments on the updated version)
    Rubtsova, N. A.
    Mishchenko, A., V
    Danilov, V. V.
    Gulin, G. A.
    Alekseev, B. Ya
    Kaprin, A. D.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (02): : 15 - 28
  • [4] Prostate MRI with PI-RADS v2.1: initial detection and active surveillance
    Lo, Grace C.
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (07) : 2133 - 2142
  • [5] Prostate MRI with PI-RADS v2.1: initial detection and active surveillance
    Grace C. Lo
    Daniel J. A. Margolis
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 2133 - 2142
  • [6] Comparison of diagnostic performance and inter-reader agreement between PI-RADS v2.1 and PI-RADS v2: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Chau Hung
    Vellayappan, Balamurugan
    Tan, Cher Heng
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 95 (1131):
  • [7] Index lesion detection in multifocal prostate cancer: Simplified PI-RADS biparametric MRI vs PI-RADS v2.1 multiparametric MRI
    Scialpi, Michele
    Martorana, Eugenio
    Torre, Riccardo
    Scalera, Giovanni Battista
    Belatti, Eugenio
    Improta, Antonio
    Aisa, Maria Cristina
    Burani, Aldo
    Santini, Nicola
    D'Andrea, Alfredo
    Mancioli, Francesco Maria
    Scialpi, Pietro
    Di Blasi, Aldo
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2023, 94 : 108 - 115
  • [8] PI-RADS v2.1和PI-RADS v2对移行带前列腺癌诊断价值的研究
    张丹
    朱子超
    宋娜
    王涛
    于佳
    蔡磊
    陈志强
    磁共振成像, 2022, 13 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [9] 基于前列腺逐层切片病理PI-RADS v2.1与PI-RADS v2的评分比较
    王慧慧
    高歌
    何群
    沈棋
    王鹤
    王霄英
    磁共振成像, 2022, 13 (04) : 120 - 123
  • [10] Use of Radiomics to Improve Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS v2.1 in Prostate Cancer
    Li, Mou
    Yang, Ling
    Yue, Yufeng
    Xu, Jingxu
    Huang, Chencui
    Song, Bin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10