Optimization models for financing innovations in green energy technologies

被引:35
作者
Tan, R. R. [1 ]
Aviso, K. B. [1 ]
Ng, D. K. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] De La Salle Univ, Ctr Engn & Sustainable Dev Res, Chem Engn Dept, 2401 Taft Ave, Manila 0922, Philippines
[2] Heriot Watt Univ Malaysia, Sch Engn & Phys Sci, Putrajaya 62200, Malaysia
关键词
Innovation; Green technologies; Technology readiness level (TRL); System readiness level (SRL); Integration readiness level (IRL); Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP); DECISION-MAKING; TECHNOECONOMIC ASSESSMENT; PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT; READINESS LEVEL; INVESTMENTS; SYSTEMS; RISK; BIOREFINERY; ASSESSMENTS; CHALLENGES;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2019.109258
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Commercialization of emerging green technologies is essential to improve the sustainability of industrial processes. However, there are risks inherent in funding the development of new technologies that act as a significant barrier to their commercialization. Mathematical models can provide much-needed decision support to allow optimal allocation of funds, while managing the implications of techno-economic risk. The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale is a well-established figure of merit approach for quantifying the maturity of standalone technologies, while the more recently developed System Readiness Level (SRL) scale is applicable to technology networks with interdependent components. These technology maturity scales are intended mainly to be used for the passive assessment of a given state of technology, but may be incorporated within an optimization model to aid in innovation planning. In this work, two mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models are proposed to optimize strategies for funding innovation. The first model is a bi-objective MILP for optimizing the allocation of funds to a portfolio of independent innovation projects. The model is based on source-sink formulation and uses information on TRL and return on investment (ROI) to determine the best allocation of funds. The second model is a robust MILP that optimizes the allocation of limited project funds in order to maximize the SRL of a system of emerging technologies. This approach accounts for Integration Readiness Level (IRL) among mutually interdependent technologies. Both models are demonstrated with illustrative case studies on biorefinery technologies in order to demonstrate their capabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] A technology readiness levels (TRLs) calculator software for systems engineering and technology management tool
    Altunok, Taner
    Cakmak, Tanyel
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2010, 41 (05) : 769 - 778
  • [2] A review of Battery Electric Vehicle technology and readiness levels
    Andwari, Amin Mahmoudzadeh
    Pesiridis, Apostolos
    Rajoo, Srithar
    Martinez-Botas, Ricardo
    Esfahanian, Vahid
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 78 : 414 - 430
  • [3] System Readiness Assessment (SRA) An Illustrative Example
    Austin, Marc F.
    York, Donald M.
    [J]. 2015 CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2015, 44 : 486 - 496
  • [4] A Target Oriented Robust Optimization Model for Selection of Engineering Project Portfolio under Uncertainty
    Aviso, Kathleen B.
    Sy, Charlle L.
    Tan, Raymond R.
    [J]. 27TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT A, 2017, 40A : 949 - 954
  • [5] Bandyopadhyay S, 2016, CHEM ENG PROG, V112, P46
  • [6] Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders
    Bauwens, Thomas
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 129 : 841 - 852
  • [7] Screening and techno-economic assessment of biomass-based power generation with CCS technologies to meet 2050 CO2 targets
    Bhave, Amit
    Taylor, Richard H. S.
    Fennell, Paul
    Livingston, William R.
    Shah, Nilay
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    Dennis, John
    Kraft, Markus
    Pourkashanian, Mohammed
    Insa, Mathieu
    Jones, Jenny
    Burdett, Nigel
    Bauen, Ausilio
    Beal, Corinne
    Smallbone, Andrew
    Akroyd, Jethro
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 190 : 481 - 489
  • [8] A PARAMETRIC APPROACH TO FUZZY LINEAR-PROGRAMMING
    CARLSSON, C
    KORHONEN, P
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) : 17 - 30
  • [9] An alternative neutral approach for cross-efficiency evaluation
    Carrillo, Marianela
    Jorge, Jesus M.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 120 : 137 - 145
  • [10] The effects of credit policy and financial constraints on tangible and research & development investment: Firm-level evidence from China's renewable energy industry
    Chang, Kai
    Zeng, Yonghong
    Wang, Weihong
    Wu, Xin
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 130 : 438 - 447