Monitoring visual status: Why patients do or do not comply with practice guidelines

被引:73
作者
Sloan, FA
Brown, DS
Carlisle, ES
Picone, GA
Lee, PP
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Econ, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy Law & Management, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Res Triangle Inst, Durham, NC USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[5] Univ S Florida, Dept Econ, Tampa, FL USA
[6] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
practice guidelines; compliance; eye care; diabetes mellitus; age-related macular degeneration;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00297.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To determine factors affecting compliance with guidelines for annual eye examinations for persons diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) or age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). Data Sources/Study Setting. Nationally representative, longitudinal sample of individuals 65+ drawn from the National Long-Term Care Survey (NLTCS) with linked Medicare claims records from 1991 to 1999. Study Design. Medicare beneficiaries were followed from 1991 to 1999, unless mortality intervened. All claims data were analyzed for presence of ICD-9 codes indicating diagnosis of DM or ARMD and the performance of eye exams. The dependent variable was a binary indicator for whether a person had an eye exam or not during a 15-month period. Independent variables for demographics, living conditions, supplemental insurance, income, and other factors affecting the marginal cost and benefit of an eye exam were assessed to determine reasons for noncompliance. Data Collection/Extraction Methods. Panel data were created from claims files, 1991-1999, merged with data from the NLTCS. Principal Findings. The probability of having an exam reflected perceived benefits, which vary by patient characteristics (e.g., education, no dementia), and factors associated with the ease of visit. African Americans were much less likely to be examined than were whites. Conclusions. Having an exam reflects multiple factors. However, much of the variation in the probability of an exam remained unexplained as were reasons for the racial differences in use.
引用
收藏
页码:1429 / 1448
页数:20
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] *AM AC OPHTH, 2000, PREF PRACT PATT GLAU
  • [2] *AM AC OPHTH, 2001, PREF PRACT PATT AG R
  • [3] American Academy of Ophthalmology, 1998, PREF PRACT PATT DIAB
  • [4] American Diabetes Association, 2002, DIABETES CARE S1, V25, pS90
  • [5] Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening
    Brenes, GA
    Paskett, ED
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2000, 31 (04) : 410 - 416
  • [6] CHAMBERS CV, 1989, J FAM PRACTICE, V29, P273
  • [7] CHAMPION VL, 1992, CANCER DETECT PREV, V16, P253
  • [8] Patient-reported adherence to guidelines of the Sixth Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure
    Cheng, JWM
    Kalis, MM
    Feifer, S
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2001, 21 (07): : 828 - 841
  • [9] Costanza M E, 1992, J Am Board Fam Pract, V5, P143
  • [10] Devgan U, 2000, ARCH OPHTHALMOL-CHIC, V118, P253