Machine learning models for the estimation of monthly mean daily reference evapotranspiration based on cross-station and synthetic data

被引:68
作者
Wu, Lifeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Peng, Youwen [1 ]
Fan, Junliang [2 ,4 ]
Wang, Yicheng [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanchang Inst Technol, Sch Hydraul & Ecol Engn, Nanchang 330099, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid & Semiarid Are, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
[4] Northwest A&F Univ, Coll Water Resources & Architectural Engn, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
来源
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH | 2019年 / 50卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
cross-station; Kernel-based nonlinear extension of arps decline model; machine learning; reference evapotranspiration;
D O I
10.2166/nh.2019.060
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET0) is important in hydrology research, irrigation scheduling design and water resources management. This study explored the capability of eight machine learning models, i.e., Artificial Neuron Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extreme Learning Machine and a novel Kernel-based Nonlinear Extension of Arps Decline (KNEA) Model, for modeling monthly mean daily ET0 using only temperature data from local or cross stations. These machine learning models were also compared with the temperature-based Hargreaves-Samani equation. The results indicated that the estimation accuracy of these machine learning models differed in various scenarios. The tree-based models (RF, GBDT and XGBoost) exhibited higher estimation accuracy than the other models in the local application. When the station has only temperature data, the MARS and SVM models were slightly superior to the other models, while the ANN and HS models performed worse than the others. When there was no temperature data at the target station and the data from adjacent stations were used instead, MARS, SVM and KNEA were the suitable models. The results can provide a solution for ET0 estimation in the absence of complete meteorological data.
引用
收藏
页码:1730 / 1750
页数:21
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] Ali Ghorbani M., Kazempour R., Chau K.W., Shamshirband S., Ghazvinei T., Forecasting pan evaporation with an integrated artificial neural network quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization model: A case study in Talesh, Northern Iran, Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics, 12, 1, pp. 724-737, (2018)
  • [2] Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M., Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome, 300, 9, (1998)
  • [3] Almorox J., Grieser J., Calibration of the Hargreaves-Samani method for the calculation of reference evapotranspiration in different Köppen climate classes, Hydrology Research, 47, 2, pp. 521-531, (2016)
  • [4] Almorox J., Quej V.H., Marti P., Global performance ranking of temperature-based approaches for evapotranspiration estimation considering Köppen climate classes, Journal of Hydrology, 528, pp. 514-522, (2015)
  • [5] Begueria S., Vicente-Serrano S.M., Reig F., Latorre B., Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) revisited: Parameter fitting, evapotranspiration models, tools, datasets and drought monitoring, International Journal of Climatology, 34, 10, pp. 3001-3023, (2014)
  • [6] Breiman L., Random forests, Machine Learning, 45, 1, pp. 5-32, (2001)
  • [7] Chen T., Guestrin C., Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining., pp. 785-794, (2016)
  • [8] Cobaner M., Citakoglu H., Haktanir T., Kisi O., Modifying Hargreaves-Samani equation with meteorological variables for estimation of reference evapotranspiration in Turkey, Hydrology Research, 48, 2, pp. 480-497, (2017)
  • [9] Ding C., Wang D., Ma X., Li H., Predicting short-term subway ridership and prioritizing its influential factors using gradient boosting decision trees, Sustainability, 8, 11, (2016)
  • [10] Elith J., Leathwick J.R., Hastie T., A working guide to boosted regression trees, Journal of Animal Ecology, 77, 4, pp. 802-813, (2008)