Costs of avoiding net negative emissions under a carbon budget

被引:4
作者
van der Wijst, Kaj-Ivar [1 ,2 ]
Hof, Andries F. [1 ,2 ]
van Vuuren, Detlef P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] PBL Netherlands Environm Assessment Agcy, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
climate damages; economic costs and benefits; IAMs; temperature overshoot; paris agreement; damage reversibility; CLIMATE; TEMPERATURE; POLICY; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ac03d9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The 2 degrees C and 1.5 degrees C temperature targets of the Paris Agreement can be interpreted as targets never to be exceeded, or as end-of-century targets. Recent literature proposes to move away from the latter, in favour of avoiding a temperature overshoot and the associated net negative emissions. To inform this discussion, we investigate under which conditions avoiding an overshoot is economically attractive. We show that some form of overshoot is attractive under a wide range of assumptions, even when considering the extra damages due to additional climate change in the optimisation process. For medium assumptions regarding mitigation costs and climate damages, avoiding net negative emissions leads to an increase in total costs until 2100 of 5% to 14%. However, avoiding overshoot only leads to some additional costs when mitigation costs are low, damages are high and when using a low discount rate. Finally, if damages are not fully reversible, avoiding net negative emissions can even become attractive. Under these conditions, avoiding overshoot may be justified, especially when non-monetary risks are considered.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the proportionality between global temperature change and cumulative CO2 emissions during periods of net negative CO2 emissions
    Zickfeld, Kirsten
    MacDougall, Andrew H.
    Matthews, H. Damon
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 11 (05):
  • [22] Hysteresis of the Earth system under positive and negative CO2 emissions
    Jeltsch-Thommes, Aurich
    Stocker, Thomas F.
    Joos, Fortunat
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (12)
  • [23] Model-based financial regulations impair the transition to net-zero carbon emissions
    Gasparini, Matteo
    Ives, Matthew C.
    Carr, Ben
    Fry, Sophie
    Beinhocker, Eric
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 14 (05) : 476 - 481
  • [24] Simulated responses and feedbacks of permafrost carbon under future emissions pathways and idealized solar geoengineering scenarios
    Chen, Yangxin
    Moore, John C.
    Ji, Duoying
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (02)
  • [25] Valued forest carbon sinks: How much emissions abatement costs could be reduced in China
    Lin, Boqiang
    Ge, Jiamin
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 224 : 455 - 464
  • [26] The economic costs of reducing greenhouse gas emissions under a US national renewable electricity mandate
    Crane, Keith
    Curtright, Aimee E.
    Ortiz, David S.
    Samaras, Constantine
    Burger, Nicholas
    ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2730 - 2739
  • [27] Characteristics of carbon emissions in cotton fields under mulched drip irrigation
    Zong, Rui
    Wang, Zhenhua
    Wu, Qiang
    Guo, Li
    Lin, Henry
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2020, 231 (231)
  • [28] Net ecosystem carbon budget of a grassland ecosystem in central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: integrating terrestrial and aquatic carbon fluxes at catchment scale
    Song, Chunlin
    Wang, Genxu
    Hu, Zhaoyong
    Zhang, Tao
    Huang, Kewei
    Chen, Xiaopeng
    Li, Yang
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2020, 290
  • [29] Possibility for strong northern hemisphere high-latitude cooling under negative emissions
    Schwinger, Jorg
    Asaadi, Ali
    Goris, Nadine
    Lee, Hanna
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [30] Drivers of Regional Variation in the De-Emergence of Climate Change under Negative Emissions
    Douglas, Hunter c.
    Revell, Laura e.
    Joshi, Manoj
    King, Andrew
    Harrington, Luke j.
    Frame, David j.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2025, 38 (06) : 1333 - 1350