TRENDS: How Does Partisanship Influence Policy Diffusion?

被引:10
作者
Butler, Daniel M. [1 ]
Pereira, Miguel M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
[2] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
关键词
policy diffusion; partisanship; experiments on elites; COGNITIVE HEURISTICS; PUBLIC-OPINION; POLARIZATION; ELECTIONS; IDEOLOGY; POSITION; VOTERS; CUES;
D O I
10.1177/1065912918796314
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
We explore the role of partisanship in policy diffusion. Previous studies suggest that partisanship may influence the willingness of public officials to learn from the experience of their peers. Officials' willingness to consider policies endorsed by copartisans can arise either because party labels are used as informational cues or simply due to copartisan imitation. In the latter case, knowing more about the policy trade-offs should have no effects on politicians' preferences. Based on two experiments with local public officials where both the party endorsing a policy and the type of information provided were manipulated, we find consistent partisan bias. When a policy is endorsed by copartisans, public officials are more likely to consider pursuing it, and additional policy information does not mitigate this bias. Exploratory analyses of the information-seeking behavior of officials suggest that the partisan bias is not due to differential exposure or attention to policy trade-offs.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 812
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties' Policy Statements During Elections [J].
Adams, James ;
Ezrow, Lawrence ;
Somer-Topcu, Zeynep .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2011, 55 (02) :370-382
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, POSTBROADCAST DEMOCR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1899, FLAMING SWORD, V13, P6
[4]  
Arceneaux KevinMartin Johnson., 2013, CHANGING MINDS CHANG
[5]   Party Policy Diffusion [J].
Bohmelt, Tobias ;
Ezrow, Lawrence ;
Lehrer, Roni ;
Ward, Hugh .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 110 (02) :397-410
[6]   The strategic timing of position taking in congress: A study of the North American Free Trade Agreement [J].
BoxSteffensmeier, JM ;
Arnold, LW ;
Zorn, CJW .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (02) :324-338
[7]   The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication [J].
Broockman, David E. ;
Butler, Daniel M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 61 (01) :208-221
[8]   Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate [J].
Bullock, John G. .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2011, 105 (03) :496-515
[9]   Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence [J].
Butler, Daniel M. ;
Volden, Craig ;
Dynes, Adam M. ;
Shor, Boris .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 61 (01) :37-49
[10]   How Politicians Discount the Opinions of Constituents with Whom They Disagree [J].
Butler, Daniel M. ;
Dynes, Adam M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 60 (04) :975-989