Improved bow shock model with dependence on the IMF strength

被引:69
作者
Jeráb, M
Nemecek, Z
Safránková, J
Jelínek, K
Merka, J
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Math & Phys, CR-18000 Prague 2, Czech Republic
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
关键词
solar wind interaction; upstream conditions; magnetopause; bow shock; bow shock models;
D O I
10.1016/j.pss.2004.09.032
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The presence of the bow shock in front of an obstacle immersed into a supersonic flow of collisionless plasma has been theoretically predicted and experimentally confirmed more than 40 years ago. However, in spite of a great effort of theoreticians and experimenters, we are still not able to predict the bow shock location under varying upstream conditions with a sufficient accuracy. Gasdynamic and MHD models cannot account for kinetics effects, whereas the kinetic models can be used only to study particular phenomena due to limited computer capacity. Models based on fits of experimental data usually expect that the bow shock location is a simple function of several upstream parameters as the solar wind dynamic pressure, upstream Mach number, and direction or magnitude of the interplanetary magnetic field. Since the bow shock location would be determined by the downstream parameters, these models implicitly assume that these parameters are unambiguously determined by the upstream conditions. The uncertainty of the bow shock prediction is usually attributed to the uncertainty in determination of the upstream state or to an irregular bow shock motion. We have accumulated a large set of bow shock crossings observed by INTERBALL-1 MAGION-4, GEOTAIL, IMP 8, and CLUSTER-2 spacecraft and complemented this set with upstream measurements of WIND with motivation to improve the accuracy of a prediction of the bow shock location provided by the Nmecek and Safrankova (J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 53 (1991) 1049) model. Although proposed corrections conserve a simplicity of the original model, they decrease significantly the most probable error of the prediction. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 93
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
BIEBER JW, 1979, SPEC PUBL ESA
[2]   SIMULTANEOUS IMP 2 AND OGO 1 OBSERVATIONS OF BOW SHOCK COMPRESSION [J].
BINSACK, JH ;
VASYLIUNAS, VM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1968, 73 (01) :429-+
[3]   TOWARDS AN MHD THEORY FOR THE STANDOFF DISTANCE OF EARTHS BOW SHOCK [J].
CAIRNS, IH ;
GRABBE, CL .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1994, 21 (25) :2781-2784
[4]   UNUSUAL LOCATIONS OF EARTHS BOW SHOCK ON SEPTEMBER 24-25, 1987 - MACH NUMBER EFFECTS [J].
CAIRNS, IH ;
FAIRFIELD, DH ;
ANDERSON, RR ;
CARLTON, VEH ;
PAULARENA, KI ;
LAZARUS, AJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1995, 100 (A1) :47-62
[5]   MHD SIMULATIONS OF EARTHS BOW SHOCK AT LOW MACH NUMBERS - STANDOFF DISTANCES [J].
CAIRNS, IH ;
LYON, JG .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1995, 100 (A9) :17173-17180
[6]   Magnetic field orientation effects on the standoff distance of Earth's bow shock [J].
Cairns, IH ;
Lyon, JG .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1996, 23 (21) :2883-2886
[7]   AVERAGE AND UNUSUAL LOCATIONS OF EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE AND BOW SHOCK [J].
FAIRFIELD, DH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1971, 76 (28) :6700-+
[8]   STANDING WAVES AT LOW MACH NUMBER LAMINAR BOW SHOCKS [J].
FAIRFIELD, DH ;
FELDMAN, WC .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 80 (04) :515-522
[9]   DETERMINING THE STANDOFF DISTANCE OF THE BOW SHOCK - MACH NUMBER DEPENDENCE AND USE OF MODELS [J].
FARRIS, MH ;
RUSSELL, CT .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1994, 99 (A9) :17681-17689
[10]   THE THICKNESS OF THE MAGNETOSHEATH - CONSTRAINTS ON THE POLYTROPIC INDEX [J].
FARRIS, MH ;
PETRINEC, SM ;
RUSSELL, CT .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1991, 18 (10) :1821-1824