Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem: Example of planning choice in transportation

被引:14
作者
Zhong, Tao [1 ]
Young, Rhonda [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Dept Civil & Architectural Engn, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
Transportation programming; Integer programming; Optimization; Branch and bound; BOUND ALGORITHM; BRANCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2009.06.007
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Transportation programming, a process of selecting projects for funding given budget and other constraints, is becoming more complex as a result of new federal laws, local planning regulations, and increased public involvement. This article describes the use of an integer programming tool, Multiple Choice Knapsack Problem (MCKP), to provide optimal solutions to transportation programming problems in cases where alternative versions of projects are under consideration. in this paper, optimization methods for use in the transportation programming process are compared and then the process of building and solving the optimization problems is discussed. The concepts about the use of MCKP are presented and a real-world transportation programming example at various budget levels is provided. This article illustrates how the use of MCKP addresses the modern complexities and provides timely solutions in transportation programming practice. While the article uses transportation programming as a case study, MCKP can be useful in other fields where a similar decision among a subset of the alternatives is required. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 137
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[21]  
Mathews G., 1897, London Mathematical Society, V28, P486, DOI DOI 10.1112/PLMS/S1-28.1.486
[22]   Assessing participatory GIS for community-based natural resource management: claiming community forests in Cameroon [J].
McCall, MK ;
Minang, PA .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 171 :340-356
[23]  
MCFARLAND W, 1987, 1116 TRANSP RES BOAR
[24]   Linear programming model for finding optimal roadway grades that minimize earthwork cost [J].
Moreb, AA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 93 (01) :148-154
[25]  
MUTHUSUBRAMANYA.M, 1982, 867 TRANSP RES BOARD
[26]   0-1 KNAPSACK PROBLEM WITH MULTIPLE-CHOICE CONSTRAINTS [J].
NAUSS, RM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (02) :125-131
[27]   OPTIMIZATION MODELS FOR TRANSPORTATION PROJECT PROGRAMMING PROCESS [J].
NIEMEIER, DA ;
ZABINSKY, ZB ;
ZENG, ZH ;
RUTHERFORD, GS .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1995, 121 (01) :14-26
[28]   A MINIMAL ALGORITHM FOR THE MULTIPLE-CHOICE KNAPSACK-PROBLEM [J].
PISINGER, D .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 83 (02) :394-410
[29]  
Rinner C., 2002, Journal of Geographical Systems, V4, P385, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S101090300095, 10.1007/s101090300095]
[30]   MULTIPLE-CHOICE KNAPSACK PROBLEM [J].
SINHA, P ;
ZOLTNERS, AA .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1979, 27 (03) :503-533