A radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus augmentation

被引:15
作者
Kim, Do-Hyung [1 ]
Ko, Min-Jeong [1 ]
Lee, Jae-Hong [1 ]
Jeong, Seoung-Nyum [1 ]
机构
[1] Wonkwang Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Periodontol, Daejeon Dent Hosp, 77 Dunsan Ro, Daejeon 35233, South Korea
关键词
Alveolar bone grafting; Dental implants; Sinus floor augmentation; FLOOR AUGMENTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BONE; CLASSIFICATION; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.5051/jpis.2018.48.3.174
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aims of the present study were to quantitatively assess graft height changes after sinus lift procedures and to analyze the factors that influenced graft height changes, including the residual bone height before surgery, surgical approach, and tooth type. Methods: A total of 39 maxillary posterior implants placed during a simultaneous sinus lift procedure were evaluated. Panoramic radiographs of all patients were taken immediately after implant installation and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years. To analyze graft height changes over time, we measured the distance between the implant platform and the base of the grafted sinus floor at 3 locations. The radiographs were analyzed by a single examiner. Results: Graft height tended to decrease over time, and a statistically significant difference was observed at 2 years compared to baseline (P< 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in graft height change according to the surgical approach or tooth type. For residual bone height, a statistically significant difference in graft height change was found between those with 4-7 mm of residual bone height and those with 7 mm (P<0.05). Conclusions: Graft height after sinus lift procedures significantly decreased at 2 years compared to baseline after sinus augmentation. Further studies should be done with controlled variables, and prospective studies with 3-dimensional images are needed to clarify the factors that influence graft height changes.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 181
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen-stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentationComplications, patient-reported outcomes and volumetric analysis [J].
Alayan, Jamil ;
Ivanovski, Saso .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2018, 29 (02) :248-262
[2]  
BOYNE PJ, 1980, J ORAL SURG, V38, P613
[3]   Evaluation of maxillary sinus width on cone-beam computed tomography for sinus augmentation and new sinus classification based on sinus width [J].
Chan, Hsun-Liang ;
Suarez, Fernando ;
Monje, Alberto ;
Benavides, Erika ;
Wang, Hom-Lay .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (06) :647-652
[4]  
CHANAVAZ M, 1990, Journal of Oral Implantology, V16, P199
[5]  
Davarpanah M, 2001, INT J PERIODONT REST, V21, P599
[6]  
FREDHOLM U, 1993, SWED DENT J, V17, P103
[7]  
Geurs NC, 2001, INT J PERIODONT REST, V21, P517
[8]   A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants [J].
Hatano, N ;
Shimizu, Y ;
Ooya, K .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2004, 15 (03) :339-345
[9]  
Hieu Pham-Duong, 2010, J Periodontal Implant Sci, V40, P25, DOI 10.5051/jpis.2010.40.1.25
[10]  
Hurzeler M B, 1996, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V11, P466