From international health to global health: how to foster a better dialogue between empirical and normative disciplines

被引:19
作者
Ooms, Gorik [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Trop Med, Dept Publ Hlth, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Law & Dev Res Grp, Fac Law, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
来源
BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS | 2014年 / 14卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Global health; International health; Human rights; Ethics; Empirical; Normative; Is-ought problem; Interdisciplinary research; MACHINE POLITICS; POLICY; GHOST;
D O I
10.1186/s12914-014-0036-5
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Public health recommendations are usually based on a mixture of empirical evidence and normative arguments: to argue that authorities ought to implement an intervention that has proven effective in improving people's health requires a normative position confirming that the authorities are responsible for improving people's health. While public health (at the national level) is based on a widely accepted normative starting point - namely, that it is the responsibility of the state to improve people's health - there is no widely accepted normative starting point for international health or global health. As global health recommendations may vary depending on the normative starting point one uses, global health research requires a better dialogue between researchers who are trained in empirical disciplines and researchers who are trained in normative disciplines. Discussion: Global health researchers with a background in empirical disciplines seem reluctant to clarify the normative starting point they use, perhaps because normative statements cannot be derived directly from empirical evidence, or because there is a wide gap between present policies and the normative starting point they personally support. Global health researchers with a background in normative disciplines usually do not present their work in ways that help their colleagues with a background in empirical disciplines to distinguish between what is merely personal opinion and professional opinion based on rigorous normative research. If global health researchers with a background in empirical disciplines clarified their normative starting point, their recommendations would become more useful for their colleagues with a background in normative disciplines. If global health researchers who focus on normative issues used adapted qualitative research guidelines to present their results, their findings would be more useful for their colleagues with a background in empirical disciplines. Summary: Although a single common paradigm for all scientific disciplines that contribute to global health research may not be possible or desirable, global health researchers with a background in empirical disciplines and global health researchers with a background in normative disciplines could present their 'truths' in ways that would improve dialogue. This paper calls for an exchange of views between global health researchers and editors of medical journals.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Where is the gap?: the contribution of disparities within developing countries to global inequalities in under-five mortality
    Amouzou, Agbessi
    Kozuki, Naoko
    Gwatkin, Davidson R.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1912, PHILOS REV, DOI 10.2307/2177252
  • [3] Distributing Who Gets What and Why: Four Normative Approaches to Global Health
    Brown, Garrett Wallace
    [J]. GLOBAL POLICY, 2012, 3 (03) : 292 - 302
  • [4] Evidence-Based Public Health: A Fundamental Concept for Public Health Practice
    Brownson, Ross C.
    Fielding, Jonathan E.
    Maylahn, Christopher A.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 30 : 175 - 201
  • [5] A Ghost in the Machine? Politics in Global Health Policy
    Bruen, Carlos
    Brugha, Ruairi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 3 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [6] Barriers to using skilled birth attendants' services in mid- and far-western Nepal: a cross-sectional study
    Choulagai, Bishnu
    Onta, Sharad
    Subedi, Narayan
    Mehata, Suresh
    Bhandari, Gajananda P.
    Poudyal, Amod
    Shrestha, Binjwala
    Mathai, Matthews
    Petzold, Max
    Krettek, Alexandra
    [J]. BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 2013, 13
  • [7] Clark JP., 2003, PEER REV HLTH SCI, VSecondth
  • [8] Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health, 1988, DIV HLTH CAR SERV I
  • [9] An alternative strategy to reduce maternal mortality
    Costello, Anthony
    Azad, Kishwar
    Barnett, Sarah
    [J]. LANCET, 2006, 368 (9546) : 1477 - 1479
  • [10] Health Diplomacy and the Enduring Relevance of Foreign Policy Interests
    Feldbaum, Harley
    Michaud, Joshua
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (04)