Machine learning algorithms for prediction of penetration depth and geometrical analysis of weld in friction stir spot welding process

被引:13
作者
Bahedh, Abdulbaseer S. [1 ]
Mishra, Akshansh [2 ]
Al-Sabur, Raheem [1 ]
Jassim, Ahmad K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basrah, Dept Mech Engn, Basra 61001, Iraq
[2] Politecn Milan, Dept Chem Mat & Chem Engn Giulio Natta, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Basrah, Dept Mat Engn, Basra 61001, Iraq
关键词
friction stir spot welding; machine learning; geometrical features; image processing; maximum penetration depth; CLASSIFICATION; JOINT;
D O I
10.1051/metal/2022032
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
Nowadays, manufacturing sectors harness the power of machine learning and data science algorithms to make predictions of the optimization of mechanical and microstructure properties of fabricated mechanical components. The application of these algorithms reduces the experimental cost beside leads to reduce the time of experiments. The present research work is based on the depth of penetration prediction using supervised machine learning algorithms such as support vector machines (SVM), random forest algorithm, and robust regression algorithm. A friction stir spot welding (FSSW) was used to join two specimens of AA1230 aluminum alloys. The dataset consists of three input parameters: rotational speed (rpm), dwelling time (s), and axial load (kN), on which the machine learning models were trained and tested. The robust regression machine learning algorithm outperformed the rest algorithms by resulting in the coefficient of determination of 0.96. The second-best algorithm is the support vector machine algorithm, which has a value of 0.895 on the testing dataset. The research work also highlights the application of image processing techniques to find the geometrical features of the weld formation. The eroding and dilating procedures were carried out by the kernel size (3, 3) of type int 8. The results showed that the used algorithms can be considered to calculate the area, major/minor axis lengths, and the perimeter of the FSSW samples.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Al-Sabur Raheem K., 2018, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, V455, DOI 10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012087
[2]   Contact resistance prediction of zirconium joints welded by small scale resistance spot welding using ANN and RSM models [J].
Al-Sabur, Raheem ;
Slobodyan, Mikhail ;
Chhalotre, Sanjay ;
Verma, Manoj .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 47 :5907-5911
[3]   Tensile strength prediction of aluminium alloys welded by FSW using response surface methodology-Comparative review [J].
Al-Sabur, Raheem .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 45 :4504-4510
[4]   Real-time monitoring applied to optimize friction stir spot welding joint for AA1230 Al-alloys [J].
Al-Sabur, Raheem ;
Jassim, Ahmad K. ;
Messele, Eyob .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 42 :2018-2024
[6]   Friction stir welding tool condition monitoring using vibration signals and Random forest algorithm-A Machine learning approach [J].
Balachandar, K. ;
Jegadeeshwaran, R. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2021, 46 :1174-1180
[7]  
Bonaccorso G., 2017, Mastering machine learning algorithms: Expert techniques for implementing popular machine learning algorithms, fine-tuning your models, and understanding how they work
[8]  
Charbuty B., 2021, J. Appl. Sci. Technol. Trends, V2, P20, DOI [DOI 10.38094/JASTT20165, 10.38094/jastt20165]
[9]   Machine learning based hierarchy of causative variables for tool failure in friction stir welding [J].
Du, Y. ;
Mukherjee, T. ;
Mitra, P. ;
DebRoy, T. .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2020, 192 :67-77
[10]  
McGregor A, 2004, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V3015, P205