Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging

被引:19
|
作者
Ma, Ting Martin [1 ]
Gafita, Andrei [2 ]
Shabsovich, David [1 ]
Juarez, Jesus [1 ]
Grogan, Tristan R. [3 ]
Thin, Pan [2 ]
Armstrong, Wesley [2 ]
Sonni, Ida [2 ]
Nguyen, Kathleen [2 ]
Lok, Vincent [2 ]
Reiter, Robert E. [4 ]
Rettig, Matthew B. [4 ,5 ]
Steinberg, Michael L. [1 ]
Kupelian, Patrick A. [1 ]
Yang, David D. [6 ]
Muralidhar, Vinayak [6 ]
Chu, Carissa [7 ]
Feng, Felix [7 ,8 ]
Savjani, Ricky [1 ]
Deng, Jie [1 ]
Parikh, Neil R. [1 ]
Nickols, Nicholas G. [1 ]
Elashoff, David [3 ]
Czernin, Johannes [2 ]
Calais, Jeremie [2 ]
Kishan, Amar U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Mol & Med Pharmacol, Ahmanson Translat Theranost Div, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Stat Core, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Harvard Radiat Oncol Program, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] UCSF, Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY | 2022年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Staging; Prostate-specific membrane antigen; Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Conventional imaging; Overall upstaging; Percent positive core; Gleason grade; Nomogram;
D O I
10.1016/j.euo.2021.01.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) is an emerging imaging modality with greater sensi-tivity and specificity over conventional imaging for prostate cancer (PCa) staging. Using data from two prospective trials (NCT03368547 and NCT04050215), we explored predictors of overall upstaging (nodal and metastatic) by PSMA PET/CT among patients with cN0M0 National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk PCa on conventional imaging (n = 213). Overall, 21.1%, 8.9%, and 23.9% of patients experienced nodal, metastatic, and overall upstaging, respectively, without histo-logic confirmation. On multivariable analysis, Gleason grade group (GG) and percent positive core (PPC) on systematic biopsy significantly predict overall upstaging (odds ratio [OR] 2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.45; p = 0.002; and OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.04; p < 0.001). Overall upstaging was signifi- cantly more frequent among men with GG 5 disease (33.0% vs. 17.6%; p = 0.0097) and PPC >= 50% (33.0% vs 15.0%; p = 0.0020). We constructed a nomogram that predicts overall upstaging using initial prostate-specific antigen, PPC, GG, and cT stage, with coefficients estimated from a standard logistic regression model (using maximum likelihood estimation). It is internally validated with a tenfold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve estimated at 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82). In our cohort, 90% of patients who had a nomogram-estimated risk below the cutoff of 22% for overall upstaging could have been spared PSMA PET/CT as our model correctly predicted no upstaging. In other words, the predictive model only missed 10% of patients who would otherwise have benefitted from PSMA PET/CT. Patient summary: We analyzed predictors of overall upstaging (lymph node or/ and metastasis) by prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) from conventional imaging in men with high-risk prostate cancer undergoing initial staging deemed free of disease in the lymph nodes and distant metastasis by conventional imaging techniques. We found that the pathologic grade and disease burden in a prostate biopsy are associated with upstaging. We also developed a tool that predicts the probability of upstaging according to an individual patient's characteristics. Our study may help in defining patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the addition of a PSMA PET/CT scan. (c) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 103
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of 68Ga-labeled Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Ligand Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ling, Sui Wai
    de Jong, Anouk C.
    Schoots, Ivo G.
    Nasserinejad, Kazem
    Busstra, Martijn B.
    van der Veldt, Astrid A. M.
    Brabander, Tessa
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 33 : 61 - 71
  • [22] Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot
    Jiao, Jianhua
    Zhang, Jingliang
    Li, Zeyu
    Wen, Weihong
    Cui, Chaochao
    Zhang, Qiang
    Wang, Jing
    Qin, Weijun
    CANCER LETTERS, 2022, 548
  • [23] The CONFIRM trial protocol: the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography in active surveillance for prostate cancer
    Bagguley, Dominic
    Harewood, Laurence
    McKenzie, Dean
    Ptasznik, Gideon
    Ong, Sean
    Chengodu, Thilakavathi
    Woon, Dixon
    Sim, Kenneth
    Sheldon, James
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 133 : 27 - 36
  • [24] Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in prostate cancer: a step toward personalized medicine
    Bouchelouche, Kirsten
    Choyke, Peter L.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 28 (03) : 216 - 221
  • [25] The Evaluation of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Initial Staging in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis
    Evangelista, Laura
    Guglielmo, Priscilla
    Giacoppo, Giulia
    Setti, Lucia
    Arico, Demetrio
    Muraglia, Lorenzo
    Marzo, Katia
    Buffi, Nicolo
    Fasulo, Vittorio
    Rodari, Marcello
    Jandric, Jelena
    Salvaggio, Antonio
    Bonacina, Manuela
    Lazzeri, Massimo
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (23)
  • [26] New frontiers in prostate cancer imaging: clinical utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography
    Asim Afaq
    Deepak Batura
    Jamshed Bomanji
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 : 803 - 810
  • [27] High Detection Rates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Prostate Cancer Recurrence at Low Prostate-specific Antigen levels on Extended Axial Field-of-view Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography
    Thomas, Sarah
    Callahan, Jason
    Conway, Paul
    Moon, Daniel
    Morgan, Hugh
    Ingbritsen, Johanna
    Munro, Melissa
    Ware, Robert E.
    Dundee, Phil
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2025, 71 : 49 - 56
  • [28] Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and staging high risk prostate cancer: a non-systematic review of high clinical impact literature
    Morigi, Joshua J.
    Anderson, Jack
    De Nunzio, Cosimo
    Fanti, Stefano
    MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2021, 73 (01): : 32 - 41
  • [29] Comparative study between 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and conventional imaging in the initial staging of prostate cancer
    Wong, Hui Sze
    Leung, John
    Bartholomeusz, Dylan
    Sutherland, Peter
    Le, Hien
    Nottage, Michelle
    Iankov, Ivan
    Chang, Joe H.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 62 (06) : 816 - 822
  • [30] Defining Prostatic Vascular Pedicle Recurrence and the Anatomy of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
    Dundee, Philip
    Furrer, Marc A.
    Corcoran, Niall M.
    Peters, Justin
    Pan, Henry
    Ballok, Zita
    Ryan, Andrew
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Costello, Anthony J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 41 : 116 - 122