Optimizing TEG Dehydration Process under Metamodel Uncertainty

被引:5
作者
Mukherjee, Rajib [1 ,2 ]
Diwekar, Urmila M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Permian Basin, Dept Chem Engn, Odessa, TX 79762 USA
[2] Vishwamitra Res Inst, Crystal Lake, IL 60012 USA
关键词
TEG dehydration process; BTEX mitigation; metamodeling uncertainty; support vector regression (SVR); BONUS algorithm; Value of Stochastic Solution (VSS); NATURAL-GAS DEHYDRATION; GLYCOL DEHYDRATION; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; PARAMETERS; REGRESSION; PLACEMENT; SELECTION; EMISSION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.3390/en14196177
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Natural gas processing requires the removal of acidic gases and dehydration using absorption, mainly conducted in tri-ethylene glycol (TEG). The dehydration process is accompanied by the emission of volatile organic compounds, including BTEX. In our previous work, multi-objective optimization was undertaken to determine the optimal operating conditions in terms of the process parameters that can mitigate BTEX emission using data-driven metamodeling and metaheuristic optimization. Data obtained from a process simulation conducted using the ProMax (R) process simulator were used to develop a metamodel with machine learning techniques to reduce the computational time of the iterations in a robust process simulation. The metamodels were created using limited samples and some underlying phenomena must therefore be excluded. This introduces the so-called metamodeling uncertainty. Thus, the performance of the resulting optimized process variables may be compromised by the lack of adequately accounting for the uncertainty introduced by the metamodel. In the present work, the bias of the metamodel uncertainty was addressed for parameter optimization. An algorithmic framework was developed for parameter optimization, given these uncertainties. In this framework, metamodel uncertainties are quantified using real model data to generate distribution functions. We then use the novel Better Optimization of Nonlinear Uncertain Systems (BONUS) algorithm to solve the problem. BTEX mitigation is used as the objective of the optimization. Our algorithm allows the determination of the optimal process condition for BTEX emission mitigation from the TEG dehydration process under metamodel uncertainty. The BONUS algorithm determines optimal process conditions compared to those from the metaheuristic method, resulting in BTEX emission mitigation up to 405.25 ton/yr.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PROMAX FDN
[2]   Optimal Selection of Shale Gas Processing and NGL Recovery Plant from Multiperiod Simulation [J].
Asani, Rekha Reddy ;
Mukherjee, Rajib ;
El-Halwagi, Mahmoud M. .
PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 5 (01) :123-138
[3]   Optimization of process parameters for glycol unit to mitigate the emission of BTEX/VOCs [J].
Braek, AM ;
Almehaideb, RA ;
Darwish, N ;
Hughes, R .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2001, 79 (B4) :218-232
[4]   Optimization of triethylene glycol dehydration of natural gas [J].
Chebbi, Rachid ;
Qasim, Muhammad ;
Jabbar, Nabil Abdel .
ENERGY REPORTS, 2019, 5 :723-732
[5]  
Diwekar U., 2015, BONUS Algorithm for Large Scale Stochastic Nonlinear Programming Problems
[6]  
Diwekar U., 2008, Introduction to Applied Optimization, V22, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-76635-5
[7]   Optimizing spatiotemporal sensors placement for nutrient monitoring: a stochastic optimization framework [J].
Diwekar, Urmila ;
Mukherjee, Rajib .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2017, 19 (09) :2305-2316
[8]   Parametric analysis of natural gas dehydration by a triethylene glycol solution [J].
Gandhidasan, P .
ENERGY SOURCES, 2003, 25 (03) :189-201
[9]  
Gupta A., 1996, P ABU DHABI INT PETR, DOI [10.2118/36225-MS, DOI 10.2118/36225-MS]
[10]   Impact of Sampling Technique on the Performance of Surrogate Models Generated with Artificial Neural Network (ANN): A Case Study for a Natural Gas Stabilization Unit [J].
Ibrahim, Mohamed ;
Al-Sobhi, Saad ;
Mukherjee, Rajib ;
AlNouss, Ahmed .
ENERGIES, 2019, 12 (10)