Identifying Industry 4.0 IoT enablers by integrated PCA-ISM-DEMATEL approach

被引:104
作者
Rajput, Shubhangini [1 ]
Singh, Surya Prakash [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, Dept Management Studies, New Delhi, India
关键词
IoT; PCA; ISM; DEMATEL (pessimistic); DEMATEL (optimistic); Industry; 4; 0; SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT; BIG DATA; INTERNET; TECHNOLOGY; OPERATIONS;
D O I
10.1108/MD-04-2018-0378
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify, analyze and model Internet of Things (IoT) enablers essential for the success of Industry 4.0. Design/methodology/approach IoT enablers for Industry 4.0 are identified from literature and inferable discussions with industry experts. Three different techniques namely, principal component analysis (PCA), interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) are applied to model IoT enablers. In addition to this, DEMATEL is also applied under two different situations representing the behavioral characteristic of experts involved. These are termed as optimistic (maximum) and pessimistic (minimum). Findings The integrated approach of PCA-ISM-DEMATEL shows that IoT ecosystem and IoT Big Data are the most influential or driving IoT enablers. These two enablers have been identified as the pillars for Industry 4.0. On the other side, IoT interchangeability, consumer IoT, IoT robustness and IoT interface and network capability have also been identified as the most dependent enablers for Industry 4.0. Originality/value The integrated approach-based hierarchical model and cause-effect relationship among IoT enablers are proposed which is a novel initiative for Industry 4.0. Moreover, two different variants of DEMATEL namely, pessimistic and optimistic are applied first time.
引用
收藏
页码:1784 / 1817
页数:34
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   The role of big data analytics in Internet of Things [J].
Ahmed, Ejaz ;
Yaqoob, Ibrar ;
Hashem, Ibrahim Abaker Targio ;
Khan, Imran ;
Ahmed, Abdelmuttlib Ibrahim Abdalla ;
Imran, Muhammad ;
Vasilakos, Athanasios V. .
COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2017, 129 :459-471
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J NETW SECUR ITS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, PERCEPTIONS WORLD PR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag, V13, P87, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S40171-012-0008-3, 10.1007/S40171-012-0008-3/FIGURES/4, 10.1007/S40171-012-0008-3]
[5]  
Athreya AP, 2013, 2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP OF INTERNET-OF-THINGS NETWORKING AND CONTROL (IOT-NC), P25
[6]  
Bagur H., 2016, Interoperability Issues in IoT
[7]  
Balte A., 2015, International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, V5, P450
[8]  
Beigne E, 2015, PROC EUR S-STATE DEV, P164, DOI 10.1109/ESSDERC.2015.7324739
[9]   The Internet of Things vision: Key features, applications and open issues [J].
Borgia, Eleonora .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 54 :1-31
[10]   Understanding complex relationship among JIT, lean behaviour, TQM and their antecedents using interpretive structural modelling and fuzzy MICMAC analysis [J].
Dubey, Rameshwar ;
Singh, Tripti .
TQM Journal, 2015, 27 (01) :42-62