Three-dimensional deep learning with spatial erasing for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MRI

被引:15
作者
Bengs, Marcel [1 ]
Behrendt, Finn [1 ]
Krueger, Julia [2 ]
Opfer, Roland [2 ]
Schlaefer, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ Technol, Inst Med Technol & Intelligent Syst, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Jung Diagnost GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Anomaly; Segmentation; Unsupervised; Brain MRI; 3D autoencoder;
D O I
10.1007/s11548-021-02451-9
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Purpose Brain Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs) are essential for the diagnosis of neurological diseases. Recently, deep learning methods for unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) have been proposed for the analysis of brain MRI. These methods rely on healthy brain MRIs and eliminate the requirement of pixel-wise annotated data compared to supervised deep learning. While a wide range of methods for UAD have been proposed, these methods are mostly 2D and only learn from MRI slices, disregarding that brain lesions are inherently 3D and the spatial context of MRI volumes remains unexploited. Methods We investigate whether using increased spatial context by using MRI volumes combined with spatial erasing leads to improved unsupervised anomaly segmentation performance compared to learning from slices. We evaluate and compare 2D variational autoencoder (VAE) to their 3D counterpart, propose 3D input erasing, and systemically study the impact of the data set size on the performance. Results Using two publicly available segmentation data sets for evaluation, 3D VAEs outperform their 2D counterpart, highlighting the advantage of volumetric context. Also, our 3D erasing methods allow for further performance improvements. Our best performing 3D VAE with input erasing leads to an average DICE score of 31.40% compared to 25.76% for the 2D VAE. Conclusions We propose 3D deep learning methods for UAD in brain MRI combined with 3D erasing and demonstrate that 3D methods clearly outperform their 2D counterpart for anomaly segmentation. Also, our spatial erasing method allows for further performance improvements and reduces the requirement for large data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:1413 / 1423
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Deep Learning for Brain MRI Segmentation: State of the Art and Future Directions [J].
Akkus, Zeynettin ;
Galimzianova, Alfiia ;
Hoogi, Assaf ;
Rubin, Daniel L. ;
Erickson, Bradley J. .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2017, 30 (04) :449-459
[2]  
Bakas S., 2018, arXiv
[3]   Data Descriptor: Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features [J].
Bakas, Spyridon ;
Akbari, Hamed ;
Sotiras, Aristeidis ;
Bilello, Michel ;
Rozycki, Martin ;
Kirby, Justin S. ;
Freymann, John B. ;
Farahani, Keyvan ;
Davatzikos, Christos .
SCIENTIFIC DATA, 2017, 4
[4]   Autoencoders for unsupervised anomaly segmentation in brain MR images: A comparative study [J].
Baur, Christoph ;
Denner, Stefan ;
Wiestler, Benedikt ;
Navab, Nassir ;
Albarqouni, Shadi .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2021, 69
[5]   Deep Autoencoding Models for Unsupervised Anomaly Segmentation in Brain MR Images [J].
Baur, Christoph ;
Wiestler, Benedikt ;
Albarqouni, Shadi ;
Navab, Nassir .
BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES, BRAINLES 2018, PT I, 2019, 11383 :161-169
[6]   Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction [J].
Bruno, Michael A. ;
Walker, Eric A. ;
Abujudeh, Hani H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2015, 35 (06) :1668-1676
[7]   Unsupervised lesion detection via image restoration with a normative prior [J].
Chen, Xiaoran ;
You, Suhang ;
Tezcan, Kerem Can ;
Konukoglu, Ender .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2020, 64
[8]  
Chen Xiaoran, 2018, UNSUPERVISED DETECTI, DOI 10.3929/ethz-b-000321650
[9]  
Devries T., 2017, Dataset augmentation in feature space
[10]   A comparison of automated lesion segmentation approaches for chronic stroke T1-weighted MRI data [J].
Ito, Kaori L. ;
Kim, Hosung ;
Liew, Sook-Lei .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2019, 40 (16) :4669-4685