Precision and bias of target controlled propofol infusion for sedation

被引:32
作者
Frölich, MA
Dennis, DM
Shuster, JA
Melker, RJ
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL USA
[2] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Stat, Gainesville, FL USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Engn, Gainesville, FL USA
[5] Univ Florida, Coll Engn, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Coll Engn, Dept Stat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[7] Univ Florida, Coll Engn, Dept Pediat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[8] Univ Florida, Coll Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
anaesthetics; i.v; propofol; anaesthetic techniques; computer-assisted continuous infusion; equipment; infusion pump; model; computer; pharmacokinetics; statistics; regression analysis;
D O I
10.1093/bja/aei081
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. The purpose of this study is to test precision and systematic bias of a target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol in human volunteers at two sedative concentrations. Methods. We studied the 'Diprifusor' model (Marsh Pharmacokinetics and a Graseby (R) 3400 infusion pump) in 18 human volunteers at two sedative target plasma concentrations (0.5 and 1.0 mu g ml(-1)). Twenty minutes after infusion start or change and 20 min after discontinuation of the infusion plasma propofol concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy (LC-MS). Plasma propofol concentrations were compared with concentrations predicted by the TCI system. Agreement of those two measures (precision and bias) was determined using regression analysis. Results. We found little systematic bias but poor precision. When setting the TCI system to deliver a plasma concentration of 1.0 mu g ml(-1) one can predict the actual plasma concentration with 95% confidence only within a range of 0.44-1.38 mu g ml(-1). Conclusions. This finding helps to explain differences in responses to propofol sedation; pharmacokinetic variability appears to be an important factor.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 437
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Closed-loop control of propofol anaesthesia using bispectral index™:: performance assessment in patients receiving computer-controlled propofol and manually controlled remifentanil infusions for minor surgery [J].
Absalom, AR ;
Kenny, GNC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (06) :737-741
[2]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[3]   PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL SELECTION FOR TARGET CONTROLLED INFUSIONS OF PROPOFOL - ASSESSMENT OF 3 PARAMETER SETS [J].
COETZEE, JF ;
GLEN, JB ;
WIUM, CA ;
BOSHOFF, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1328-1345
[4]  
Fechner J, 1998, ANAESTHESIST, V47, P663, DOI 10.1007/s001010050611
[5]   Propofol anaesthesia via target controlled infusion or manually controlled infusion: Effects on the bispectral index as a measure of anaesthetic depth [J].
Gale, T ;
Leslie, K ;
Kluger, M .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2001, 29 (06) :579-584
[6]  
GEPTS E, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P1256
[7]   Bispectral index, serum drug concentrations and emergence associated with individually adjusted target-controlled infusions of remifentanil and propofol for laparoscopic surgery [J].
Hoymork, SC ;
Raeder, J ;
Grimsmo, B ;
Steen, PA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 91 (06) :773-780
[8]   Comparison of arterialized venous with arterial blood propofol concentrations during sub-anaesthetic infusions in volunteers [J].
Johnston, KR ;
Vickers, MD ;
Mapleson, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1996, 76 (03) :401-404
[9]  
KAIKE KK, 2002, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V96, P1358
[10]   PHARMACOKINETIC IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CLINICAL USE OF PROPOFOL [J].
KANTO, J ;
GEPTS, E .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1989, 17 (05) :308-326