Incidence Rate of Bee Venom Acupuncture Related Anaphylaxis: A Systematic Review

被引:12
作者
Ko, Seong-Hwan [1 ]
Oh, Hyeon-Muk [2 ]
Kwon, Do-Young [1 ]
Yang, Jae-Eun [1 ]
Kim, Byung-Jun [1 ]
Ha, Hyun-Ju [1 ]
Lim, Eun-Jin [3 ]
Oh, Min-Seok [1 ]
Son, Chang-Gue [4 ]
Lee, Eun-Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] Daejeon Univ, Dept Korean Rehabil Med, Coll Korean Med, Daejeon 35235, South Korea
[2] Daejeon Univ, Dept Korean Internal Med, Coll Korean Med, Daejeon 35235, South Korea
[3] CHA Univ, Grad Sch Integrat Med, Dept Integrat Med, 120 Haeryong Ro, Pochon 11160, South Korea
[4] Daejeon Univ, Liver & Immunol Res Ctr, Daejeon Korean Med Hosp, Daejeon 35235, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
bee venom acupuncture; anaphylaxis; systematic review; incidence rate;
D O I
10.3390/toxins14040238
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Background: Bee venom acupuncture (BVA) is an effective treatment method for various diseases. Bee venom, however, can cause adverse effects, even rarely including life-threatening anaphylaxis, so safety-related evidence is required. In this study, we systematically estimated the incidence rate of anaphylaxis in response to BVA. Methods: We searched eight databases (MEDLINE (Pubmed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled, KISS, KMBASE, Koreamed, OASIS, and NDSL) and systematically reviewed the articles that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: Among 225 potentially relevant articles, 49 were selected for this study. The overall incidence rate of anaphylaxis in response to BVA was 0.045% (95% CI 0.028-0.062). Women (0.083%, 95% CI 0.010-0.157) showed a higher incidence rate than men (0.019%, 95% CI -0.018 to 0.055), while the incidence for patients who had a skin test conducted (0.041%, 95% CI 0.011-0.072) was not significantly different compared to that obtained for patients for which there was no information about a skin test (0.047%, 95% CI 0.026-0.067). The publication year affected the incidence rate: it was highest before 1999 (1.099%, 95% CI -1.043 to 3.241), lower between 2000 and 2009 (0.049%, 95% CI 0.025-0.073), and lowest between 2010 and 2021 (0.037% 95% CI 0.014-0.060). Conclusions: In this study, we provide reference data about risk size and factors of BVA-related anaphylaxis, which is essentially required for BVA application in clinics.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Abdela N., 2016, Adv Life Sci Technol, V44, P18
[2]  
Ali M.A., 2012, Int. J. Adv. Res. Technol, V1, P69
[3]   Skin testing for immediate hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: a case series and literature review [J].
Baker, A. ;
Empson, M. ;
The, R. ;
Fitzharris, P. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2015, 45 (03) :669-676
[4]   Which clinical studies provide the best evidence? The best RCT still trumps the best observational study [J].
Barton, S .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7256) :255-256
[5]  
Castro HJ, 2005, ALLERGY ASTHMA PROC, V26, P470
[6]   To bee or not to bee: The potential efficacy and safety of bee venom acupuncture in humans [J].
Cherniack, E. Paul ;
Govorushko, Sergey .
TOXICON, 2018, 154 :74-78
[7]  
Choi YC, 2006, J PHARMACOPUNCT, V9, P105
[8]   Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis Documented in Electronic Health Records [J].
Dhopeshwarkar, Neil ;
Sheikh, Aziz ;
Doan, Raymond ;
Topaz, Maxim ;
Bates, David W. ;
Blumenthal, Kimberly G. ;
Zhou, Li .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2019, 7 (01) :103-111
[9]  
Hwang YJ, 2000, J KOREAN ACUPUNCT MO, V17, P149, DOI DOI 10.3831/KPI.2014.17.032
[10]   Clinical Effectiveness and Adverse Events of Bee Venom Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials [J].
Jang, Soobin ;
Kim, Kyeong Han .
TOXINS, 2020, 12 (09)