The mediating role of quality on the relationship between cultural ambidexterity and innovation performance

被引:37
作者
Rafailidis, Apostolos [1 ]
Trivellas, Panagiotis [2 ]
Polychroniou, Panagiotis [3 ]
机构
[1] Technol Educ Inst Western Greece, Dept Business Adm Patras, Patras, Greece
[2] Technol Educ Inst Cent Greece, Dept Logist Management, Thiva, Greece
[3] Univ Patras, Dept Business Adm, Patras, Greece
关键词
Organisational culture; learning; ambidexterity; quality; innovation; ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; EXPLOITATION; ANTECEDENTS; EXPLORATION; TQM; IMPACT; FIRMS; SMES;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2017.1309122
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Firms' competencies and competitive advantages erode and are required to continually update and change through learning. Organisational learning is a prerequisite for the creation and acquisition of knowledge, both catalysts for innovation. There are two processes of learning, exploitation (incremental) and exploration (discontinuous). Organisational excellence can in part be achieved by ambidexterity, that is, by the balanced pursuit of both incremental and discontinuous change by organisations. An ambidextrous organisational culture can be an important factor for a firm's innovation capability. Thus, factors affecting organisational culture towards learning may advance innovative capability. Quality also plays an important role to knowledge creation and innovation behaviour. Indeed, knowledge management can improve innovation performance via total quality management practices. Quality, then, may serve as a mediator between organisational learning culture and innovation outcomes. Using the Organization's for Economic Cooperation and Development and European Union established criteria for technological intensity, as well as knowledge - intensity criteria, 480 Greek mid-to-high technology and Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) were contacted with 54 eventually participating. Statistical analysis (partial least squares-structural equation modeling) confirms the mediating role of the quality competitive capability on the association between exploitation and exploration-oriented organisational cultures and innovation performance. The study is cross-sectional, thus causality of the relationships under investigation cannot be justified. The cultural context should also be considered, since field research was conducted in Greece suffering from deep financial recession. The importance of quality competitive capability, in order to interpret organisational ambidexterity into innovative action in mid-to-high technology Greek SMEs during the financial crisis, guides managerial implications.
引用
收藏
页码:1134 / 1148
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, ISIC Rev, V3
[2]   Knowledge creation through quality management [J].
Asif, Muhammad ;
de Vries, Henk J. ;
Ahmad, Niaz .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2013, 24 (5-6) :664-677
[3]  
Barclay D., 1995, Technology Studies
[4]   Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge [J].
Bell, BS ;
Kozlowski, SWJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 87 (03) :497-505
[5]  
Birkinshaw J., 2004, MIT Sloan Management Review, V45, P47, DOI DOI 10.2139/SSRN.1306922
[6]  
Boselie P., 2002, MANAG SERV QUAL, V12, P165, DOI DOI 10.1108/09604520210429231
[7]   Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance [J].
Boumgarden, Peter ;
Nickerson, Jackson ;
Zenger, Todd R. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (06) :587-610
[8]  
Cameron K., 1999, Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture, Based on the Competing Values Framework
[9]   A Multi-Level Model for Organizational Ambidexterity in the Search Phase of the Innovation Process [J].
Cantarello, Silvia ;
Martini, Antonella ;
Nosella, Anna .
CREATIVITY AND INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 21 (01) :28-48
[10]   Motivating Organizations to Learn: Goal Orientation and Its Influence on Organizational Learning [J].
Chadwick, Ingrid C. ;
Raver, Jana L. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2015, 41 (03) :957-986