Abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis

被引:30
作者
Cheng, Yao [1 ]
Zhou, Shiyi [2 ]
Zhou, Rongxing [1 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ]
Wu, Sijia [1 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ]
Ye, Hui [1 ]
Lin, Yixin [1 ]
Wu, Taixiang [3 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Bile Duct Surg, 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Pharm, Dept Chem Med Nat Prod, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Chinese Eth Comm Registering Clin Trials, Chinese Clin Trial Registry, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS | 2015年 / 02期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Abdominal Abscess [prevention & control; Appendectomy [adverse effects; Appendicitis [complications; surgery; Drainage [methods; Emergencies; Length of Stay; Peritoneal Diseases [prevention & control; Postoperative Complications [prevention & control; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Humans; PERFORATED APPENDICITIS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CHILDREN; METAANALYSIS; INFECTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD010168.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Appendectomy, the surgical removal of the appendix, is performed primarily for acute appendicitis. Patients who undergo appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, defined as gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, are more likely to suffer from postoperative complications. The routine use of abdominal drainage to reduce postoperative complications after appendectomy for complicated appendicitis is controversial. Objectives To assess the safety and efficacy of abdominal drainage to prevent intra-peritoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Search methods We searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2014), MEDLINE (1950 to February 2014), EMBASE (1974 to February 2014), Science Citation Index Expanded (1900 to February 2014), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) (1978 to February 2014). Selection criteria We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared abdominal drainage and no drainage in patients undergoing emergency open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Data collection and analysis Two review authors identified the trials for inclusion, collected the data, and assessed the risk of bias independently. We performed the meta-analyses using Review Manager 5. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes (or a Peto odds ratio for very rare outcomes), and the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Main results We included five trials involving 453 patients with complicated appendicitis who were randomised to the drainage group (n = 228) and the no drainage group (n = 225) after emergency open appendectomies. All of the trials were at a high risk of bias. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of intra-peritoneal abscess or wound infection. The hospital stay was longer in the drainage group than in the no drainage group (MD 2.04 days; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.62) (34.4% increase of an ' average' hospital stay). Authors' conclusions The quality of the current evidence is very low. It is not clearwhether routine abdominal drainage has any effect on the prevention of intraperitoneal abscess after open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Abdominal drainage after an emergency open appendectomy may be associated with delayed hospital discharge for patients with complicated appendicitis.
引用
收藏
页数:39
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF APPENDICITIS AND APPENDECTOMY IN THE UNITED-STATES [J].
ADDISS, DG ;
SHAFFER, N ;
FOWLER, BS ;
TAUXE, RV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1990, 132 (05) :910-925
[2]   Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis-the role of routine abdominal drainage [J].
Allemann, Pierre ;
Probst, Herve ;
Demartines, Nicolas ;
Schaefer, Markus .
LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2011, 396 (01) :63-68
[3]   Antibiotics versus placebo for prevention of postoperative infection after appendicectomy. [J].
Andersen, BR ;
Kallehave, FL ;
Andersen, HK .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2005, (03)
[4]  
Andersen HK, 2013, COCHRANE REVIEW GROU
[5]   INDICATIONS FOR OPERATION IN SUSPECTED APPENDICITIS AND INCIDENCE OF PERFORATION [J].
ANDERSSON, R ;
HUGANDER, A ;
THULIN, A ;
NYSTROM, PO ;
OLAISON, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6921) :107-110
[6]   Epidemiology of Appendectomy and Appendicitis in the Valencian Community (Spain), 1998-2007 [J].
Andreu-Ballester, J. C. ;
Gonzalez-Sanchez, A. ;
Ballester, F. ;
Almela-Quilis, A. ;
Cano-Cano, M. J. ;
Millan-Scheiding, M. ;
Ruiz del Castillo, J. .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 26 (05) :406-412
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[8]  
[Anonymous], Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool
[9]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HANDBOOK FO
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J IRAQ POSTGRAD MED