Serum protein biomarkers for juvenile dermatomyositis: a pilot study

被引:24
作者
Tawalbeh, Shefa M. [1 ,2 ]
Marin, Wilfredo [3 ,4 ]
Morgan, Gabrielle A. [3 ,4 ]
Dang, Utkarsh J. [2 ]
Hathout, Yetrib [2 ]
Pachman, Lauren M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Binghamton, Biomed Engn Dept, Binghamton, NY USA
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Sch Pharm & Pharmaceut Sci, Johnson City, NY 13790 USA
[3] Ann & Robert H Lurie Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Rheumatol, Northwesterns Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Stanley Manne Childrens Res Inst Chicago, Cure JM Program Excellence Juvenile Myositis Res, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Juvenile dermatomyositis; SomaScan (R); Serum proteomics; Biomarkers; Pharmacodynamic biomarkers; IDIOPATHIC INFLAMMATORY MYOPATHIES; MYOSITIS ASSESSMENT; DISEASE-ACTIVITY; NATIONAL-INSTITUTE; CHILDREN; CRITERIA; MUSCULOSKELETAL; PATHOGENESIS; EXPRESSION; ARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.1186/s41927-020-00150-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundBlood accessible biomarkers to assess disease activity and their response to therapies in Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM) are urgently needed. This pilot study aims to identify serum protein biomarkers associated with clinical disease activity in untreated JDM and their response to medical therapy.MethodsSomaScan (R) technology screened JDM patients for 1305 proteins at three points: 1) before start of treatment, 2) while on therapy, and 3) after treatment tapering when patients were clinically inactive. To define disease associated biomarkers, SomaScan (R) data from untreated JDM patients (n=8) were compared to SomaScan (R) data from an independent age-matched healthy control group (n=12). Longitudinal analysis defined treatment responsive proteins at three time points: untreated (7 samples), treated (7 samples), and clinically inactive (6 samples). To confirm the SomaScan (R) data, a subset of nine candidate proteins (CXCL11, IL-17B, IL-17D, IL-22, CXCL10, MCP-1, ANGPT2, MIF, IL-23) were tested by ELISA after adding 2 JDM (one untreated, one clinically inactive) serum samples to the same group of JDM girls (8 untreated, 7 treated; 7 clinically inactive) as well as with 17 age, gender, matched healthy controls.ResultsComparison of untreated JDM versus healthy controls identified 202 elevated and 49 decreased serum proteins in JDM patients with an adjusted p-value <0.001. Only 82 out of 251 identified biomarker candidates responded to treatment while 12 out of these 82 proteins returned to their original untreated disease levels upon therapy tapering. The ELISA testing of the untreated samples for nine candidate proteins confirmed previously known biomarkers (CXCL10 or IP-10, CXCL11 or I-TAC and MCP-1) and identified novel biomarkers including IL-22, Angiopoetin-2, and IL-17B in a cross-sectional analysis comparing 8 untreated JDM and 17 age/gender matched controls. The subsequent longitudinal data by ELISA were not concordant for some biomarkers (IL-22 and IL-17B), but the other biomarkers either normalized or rebounded concordantly.ConclusionsBlood accessible protein biomarkers reflecting JDM pathophysiology were identified; some of them rebounded after therapy was tapered. Further studies bridging these biomarkers to specific clinical features of JDM are required to confirm the clinical utility of these serum protein biomarkers.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Serum protein biomarkers for juvenile dermatomyositis: a pilot study
    Shefa M. Tawalbeh
    Wilfredo Marin
    Gabrielle A. Morgan
    Utkarsh J. Dang
    Yetrib Hathout
    Lauren M. Pachman
    BMC Rheumatology, 4
  • [2] The clinical features of juvenile dermatomyositis: A single-centre cohort
    Cancarini, Paola
    Nozawa, Tomo
    Whitney, Kristi
    Bell-Peter, Audrey
    Marcuz, Jo-Anne
    Taddio, Andrea
    Guo, Jessica
    Dover, Saunya
    Feldman, Brian M.
    SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2022, 57
  • [3] Pilot Study of Etanercept in Patients With Refractory Juvenile Dermatomyositis
    Rouster-Stevens, Kelly A.
    Ferguson, Lori
    Morgan, Gabrielle
    Huang, Chiang-Ching
    Pachman, Lauren M.
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2014, 66 (05) : 783 - 787
  • [4] Juvenile Dermatomyositis
    Rhim, Jung Woo
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 29 (01): : 14 - 21
  • [5] Juvenile dermatomyositis
    Hinze, Claas
    Dressler, Frank
    Schara-Schmidt, Ulrike
    Haas, Johannes-Peter
    AKTUELLE RHEUMATOLOGIE, 2022, 47 (02) : 99 - 109
  • [6] Clinical features and outcome in a Danish cohort of juvenile dermatomyositis patients
    Mathiesen, P. R.
    Zak, M.
    Herlin, T.
    Nielsen, S. M.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 28 (05) : 782 - 789
  • [7] Juvenile dermatomyositis: a tertiary center experience
    Barut, Kenan
    Aydin, Pinar Ozge Avar
    Adrovic, Amra
    Sahin, Sezgin
    Kasapcopur, Ozgur
    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2017, 36 (02) : 361 - 366
  • [8] Actuality of juvenile dermatomyositis
    Zouagui, Amine
    Abourazzak, Sana
    Lakhdar Idrissi, Mounia
    Zohra Souilmi, Fatima
    Chaouki, Sana
    Atmani, Samir
    Bouharrou, Abdelhak
    Hida, Moustapha
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2011, 78 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [9] Juvenile dermatomyositis: Early onset and unusual presentation
    Rachadi, H.
    Bouayad, K.
    Chiheb, S.
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2016, 23 (10): : 1071 - 1075
  • [10] Juvenile Dermatomyositis: New Clues to Diagnosis and Therapy
    Pachman, Lauren M.
    Nolan, Brian E.
    DeRanieri, Deidre
    Khojah, Amer M.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2021, 7 (01) : 39 - 62