Concurrent Versus Terminal Feedback: It May Be Better to Wait

被引:81
作者
Walsh, Catharine M. [1 ]
Ling, Simon C. [1 ]
Wang, Charlie S. [1 ]
Carnahan, Heather [1 ]
机构
[1] Wilson Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 2C5, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b38daf
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Feedback is an important feature of simulation-based education. This study investigated the optimal timing of feedback for technical skills learning in novices. Method Thirty novice endoscopists were pretested on a colonoscopy simulator task. Participants then received feedback either during (concurrent) or after (terminal) each of their 12 practice trials. Effectiveness of training was assessed using an immediate posttest and one week later on retention and transfer tests. Measures included execution time and blinded expert assessments. Results Both groups performed similarly on the pre-, post-, and retention tests. At transfer, the terminal feedback group performed significantly better as measured by execution time, checklist, and global rating scores. The concurrent feedback group's performance decreased significantly on the transfer test as compared with the posttest and retention test. Conclusions Not all feedback conditions seem equally effective. The use of terminal feedback resulted in better learning as demonstrated by superior performance during transfer.
引用
收藏
页码:S54 / S57
页数:4
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HUMAN KINETICS
[2]   Fiberoptic intubation using anesthetized, paralyzed, apneic patients - Results of a resident training program [J].
Cole, AFD ;
Mallon, JS ;
Rolbin, SH ;
Ananthanarayan, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (05) :1101-1106
[3]   FEEDBACK IN CLINICAL MEDICAL-EDUCATION [J].
ENDE, J .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 250 (06) :777-781
[4]   Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: a BEME systematic review [J].
Issenberg, SB ;
McGaghie, WC ;
Petrusa, ER ;
Gordon, DL ;
Scalese, RJ .
MEDICAL TEACHER, 2005, 27 (01) :10-28
[5]   KNOWLEDGE OF RESULTS AND MOTOR LEARNING - A REVIEW AND CRITICAL REAPPRAISAL [J].
SALMONI, AW ;
SCHMIDT, RA ;
WALTER, CB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 95 (03) :355-386
[6]   Cognitive architecture and instructional design [J].
Sweller, J ;
van Merrienboer, JJG ;
Paas, FGWC .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1998, 10 (03) :251-296
[7]  
WALSH CM, 2008, CAN J GASTROENTER SA, V22
[8]   Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: A randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback [J].
Xeroulis, George J. ;
Park, Jason ;
Moidton, Carol-Anne ;
Reznick, Richard K. ;
LeBlanc, Vicki ;
Dubrowski, Adam .
SURGERY, 2007, 141 (04) :442-449