Prognostic importance of lymph node count and ratio in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: Results from a cross-sectional study

被引:6
作者
Detering, Robin [1 ]
Meyer, Vincent M. [2 ]
Borstlap, Wernard A. A. [1 ]
Beets-Tan, Regina G. H. [3 ]
Marijnen, Corrie A. M. [4 ]
Hompes, Roel [1 ]
Tanis, Pieter J. [1 ]
van Westreenen, Henderik L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Isala Hosp Zwolle, Dept Surg, Dr van Deenweg 1-11, NL-8025 AB Zwolle, Netherlands
[3] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
chemoradiotherapy; disease-free survival; lymph nodes; rectal cancer; survival; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; NUMBER; TUMOR; IMPACT; CHEMORADIATION; YIELD; STAGE; RETRIEVAL; RADIATION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1002/jso.26522
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic value of lymph node count (LNC) and lymph node ratio (LNR) in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT and total mesorectal excision (TME) for Stage I-III rectal cancer were selected from a cross-sectional study including 71 Dutch centres. Primary outcome parameters were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Prognostic significance of LNC and LNR (cut-off values 0.15, 0.20, 0.30) was tested for different (sub)groups. Results: From 2095 registered patients, 458 were included, of which 240 patients with LNC < 12 and 218 patients with LNC >= 12. LNC was not significantly associated with DFS (p = 0.35) and OS (p = 0.59). In univariable analysis, LNR was significantly associated with DFS and OS in the whole cohort and LNC subgroups, but not in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: LNC was not associated with long-term oncological outcome in rectal cancer patients treated with CRT, nor was LNR when corrected for N-stage. However, LNR might be used to identify subgroups of node-positive patients with a favourable outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 377
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more "personalized" approach to cancer staging [J].
Amin, Mahul B. ;
Greene, Frederick L. ;
Edge, Stephen B. ;
Compton, Carolyn C. ;
Gershenwald, Jeffrey E. ;
Brookland, Robert K. ;
Meyer, Laura ;
Gress, Donna M. ;
Byrd, David R. ;
Winchester, David P. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2017, 67 (02) :93-99
[2]   Prognostic significance of lymph node yield after long-course preoperative radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review [J].
Awwad, G. E. H. ;
Tou, S. I. H. ;
Rieger, N. A. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2013, 15 (04) :394-403
[3]   Impact of preoperative radiation for rectal cancer on subsequent lymph node evaluation: A population-based analysis [J].
Baxter, NN ;
Morris, AM ;
Rothenberger, DA ;
Tepper, JE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (02) :426-431
[4]   The correlation between tumour regression grade and lymph node status after chemoradiation in rectal cancer [J].
Berho, M. ;
Oviedo, M. ;
Stone, E. ;
Chen, C. ;
Nogueras, J. ;
Weiss, E. ;
Sands, D. ;
Wexner, S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (03) :254-258
[5]   Benchmarking recent national practice in rectal cancer treatment with landmark randomized controlled trials [J].
Borstlap, W. A. A. ;
Deijen, C. L. ;
den Dulk, M. ;
Bonjer, H. J. ;
van de Velde, C. J. ;
Bemelman, W. A. ;
Tanis, P. J. ;
Aalbers, A. ;
Acherman, Y. ;
Algie, G. D. ;
von Geu-sau, B. Alting ;
Amelung, F. ;
Aukema, T. S. ;
Bakker, I. S. ;
Bartels, S. A. ;
Basha, S. ;
Bastiaansen, A. J. N. M. ;
Belgers, E. ;
Bleeker, W. ;
Blok, J. ;
Bosker, R. J. I. ;
Bosmans, J. W. ;
Boute, M. C. ;
Bouvy, N. D. ;
Bouwman, H. ;
Brandt-Kerkhof, A. ;
Brinkman, D. J. ;
Bruin, S. ;
Bruns, E. R. J. ;
Burbach, J. P. M. ;
Burger, J. W. A. ;
Buskens, C. J. ;
Clermonts, S. ;
Coene, P. P. L. O. ;
Compaan, C. ;
Consten, E. C. J. ;
Darbyshire, T. ;
de Mik, S. M. L. ;
de Graaf, E. J. R. ;
de Groot, I. ;
Cappel, R. J. L. de Vos Tot Nederveen ;
de Wilt, J. H. W. ;
van der Wolde, J. ;
den Boer, F. C. ;
Dekker, J. W. T. ;
Demirkiran, A. ;
Derkx-Hendriksen, M. ;
Dijkstra, F. R. ;
van Duijvendijk, P. ;
Dunker, M. S. .
COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 19 (06) :O219-O231
[6]   Understanding the factors associated with reduction in the number of lymph nodes in rectal cancer patients treated by neoadjuvant treatment [J].
Bustamante-Lopez, L. ;
Nahas, C. S. ;
Nahas, S. C. ;
Ribeiro, U., Jr. ;
Marques, C. F. ;
Cotti, G. ;
Rocco, A. ;
Cecconello, I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (06) :925-927
[7]   Pathologic complete response implies a fewer number of lymph nodes in specimen of rectal cancer patients treated by neoadjuvant therapy and total mesorectal excision [J].
Bustamante-Lopez, Leonardo Alfonso ;
Rizkallah Nahas, Caio Sergio ;
Nahas, Sergio Carlos ;
Sparapan Marques, Carlos Frederico ;
Pinto, Rodrigo Ambar ;
Cotti, Guilherme Cutait ;
Imperiale, Antonio Rocco ;
de Mello, Evandro Sobroza ;
Ribeiro Junior, Ulysses ;
Cecconello, Ivan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 56 :283-287
[8]   Effect of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose and Schedule on Nodal Count and Its Prognostic Impact in Stage II-III Rectal Cancer [J].
Ceelen, Wim ;
Willaert, Wouter ;
Varewyck, Machteld ;
Libbrecht, Sasha ;
Goetghebeur, Els ;
Pattyn, Piet .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (12) :3899-3906
[9]   Metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III rectal cancer; prognostic significance in addition to the 7th edition of the TNM classification [J].
Dekker, J. W. T. ;
Peeters, K. C. ;
Putter, H. ;
Vahrmeijer, A. L. ;
van de Velde, C. J. H. .
EJSO, 2010, 36 (12) :1180-1186
[10]   Lymph Node Yield After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Specimens: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Fixatives [J].
Dias, Andre R. ;
Pereira, Marina Alessandra ;
de Mello, Evandro Sobroza ;
Nahas, Sergio Carlos ;
Cecconello, Ivan ;
Ribeiro, Ulysses, Jr. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (08) :888-896