Influence of divided attention on the attraction effect in multialternative choice

被引:0
作者
Tsuzuki, Takashi [1 ]
Takeda, Yuji [2 ]
Chiba, Itsuki [2 ]
机构
[1] Rikkyo Univ, Coll Contemporary Psychol, Dept Psychol, 1-2-26 Kitano, Niiza, Saitama 3528558, Japan
[2] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
来源
JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING | 2021年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
attraction effect; multialternative choice; divided attention; mental resources; MODEL; RESOURCES; JUDGMENT; DECISION; AVERSION; POWER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The attraction effect in multialternative decision making reflects the context-dependent violation of rational choice axioms. This study examined the effect of concurrent divided attention in three-alternative visual choice tasks. The concurrent divided attention task is considered to consume the mental resources available for the choice task. There were three conditions: (a) the task-relevant condition, in which the auditory task should consume resources across multiple levels; (b) the task-irrelevant condition, in which the auditory stimuli should consume perceptual resources; (c) and the control condition, in which the resources should not be consumed by auditory stimuli. Thirty-three participants solved 24 hypothetical purchase problems with three alternatives that differed in terms of two attributes. The results indicated that the choice proportion of the target was significantly higher in the task-relevant condition than in the task-irrelevant and control conditions, thereby suggesting that a reduction in cognitive (and/or response) resources is critical for the attraction effect.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 742
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Rigorously Testing Multialternative Decision Field Theory Against Random Utility Models [J].
Berkowitsch, Nicolas A. J. ;
Scheibehenne, Benjamin ;
Rieskamp, Joerg .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2014, 143 (03) :1331-1348
[2]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[3]   Cognitive and Neural Bases of Multi-Attribute, Multi-Alternative, Value-based Decisions [J].
Busemeyer, Jerome R. ;
Gluth, Sebastian ;
Rieskamp, Jorg ;
Turner, BrandonM. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (03) :251-263
[4]   THE CONCEPT OF EXTERNAL VALIDITY [J].
CALDER, BJ ;
PHILLIPS, LW ;
TYBOUT, AM .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (03) :240-244
[5]   The comparison process as an account of variation in the attraction, compromise, and similarity effects [J].
Cataldo, Andrea M. ;
Cohen, Andrew L. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2019, 26 (03) :934-942
[6]  
Cohen J., 1969, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[7]   A dual-system framework to understand preference construction processes in choice [J].
Dhar, Ravi ;
Gorlin, Margarita .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 23 (04) :528-542
[8]   Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change [J].
Escera, C ;
Alho, K ;
Winkler, I ;
t nen, RN .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (05) :590-604
[9]   G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences [J].
Faul, Franz ;
Erdfelder, Edgar ;
Lang, Albert-Georg ;
Buchner, Axel .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2007, 39 (02) :175-191
[10]  
Glaholt M. G., 2011, J NEUROSCI PSYCHOL E, V4, P125, DOI [10.1037/a0020692, DOI 10.1037/A0020692]