The environmental and economic impact of structural optimization

被引:38
作者
Lagaros, Nikos D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Dept Struct Engn, Inst Struct Anal & Antiseism Res, Sch Civil Engn, 9 Heroon Polytech Str,Zografou Campus, GR-15780 Athens, Greece
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Structural optimization; Life cycle assessment; Structural engineering practice; Material usage; Environmental and economic impact; TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION; OPTIMUM DESIGN; FRAMES; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-018-1998-z
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
According to the well-known mathematician Leonhard Euler: "Nothing takes place within the universe in which the rule of maximum or minimum does not appear." The development of optimization algorithms can be traced back to the days of Kepler, Newton, Lagrange and Cauchy and the concept of minimization much earlier to the days of Euclid. However, despite these early developments, very little progress on their use was achieved until the middle of twentieth century when digital computers made possible the application of the optimization algorithms and motivated further research, producing massive literature on the subject and development of new optimization techniques. Nevertheless, professional structural engineers and practitioners are highly sceptical in adopting such procedures in their professional life, while software applications implementing optimization techniques fall short of meeting their needs. Therefore, in this study the question that I will try to answer from an environmental and economic perspective is: "Is it worth performing structural optimization studies?" and will aim to prove that adopting optimization based design procedures will have drastic environmental impact and contribute on the economic development of the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1751 / 1768
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[21]   LCA application in the optimum design of high rise steel structures [J].
Cho, Young Sang ;
Kim, Jeom Han ;
Hong, Seong Uk ;
Kim, Yuri .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (05) :3146-3153
[22]  
Committee of Steel Structure, 2009, STAND SPEC STEEL COM
[23]  
Courant R, 1943, B AM MATH SOC, V49, P1, DOI 10.1090/S0002-9904-1943-07818-4
[24]   Geometric constraints for shape and topology optimization in architectural design [J].
Dapogny, Charles ;
Faure, Alexis ;
Michailidis, Georgios ;
Allaire, Gregoire ;
Couvelas, Agnes ;
Estevez, Rafael .
COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS, 2017, 59 (06) :933-965
[25]   A procedure for the size, shape and topology optimization of transmission line tower structures [J].
de Souza, Rafael Rodrigues ;
Fadel Miguel, Leandro Fleck ;
Lopez, Rafael Holdorf ;
Fadel Miguel, Leticia Fleck ;
Torii, Andre Jacomel .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 111 :162-184
[26]  
EUROFER, 2017, EUROFER ANN REP 2017
[27]  
European committee for standardization, 2004, EUR 2 DES CONCR ST 1
[28]   Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and costs for structures with flat slabs [J].
Ferreiro-Cabello, Javier ;
Fraile-Garcia, Esteban ;
de Pison Ascacibar, Eduardo Martinez ;
de Pison Ascacibar, Francisco Javier Martinez .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 137 :922-930
[29]  
Focus Economics, 2017, POL INT RAT 2016
[30]   Probabilistic performance-based optimal design of steel moment-resisting frames. I: Formulation [J].
Foley, Christopher M. ;
Pezeshk, Shahram ;
Alimoradi, Arzhang .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (06) :757-766