Turking in the time of COVID

被引:62
作者
Arechar, Antonio A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rand, David G. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] CIDE, Ctr Res & Teaching Econ, Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, Mexico
[2] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, E-62 Room 539,30 Mem Dr, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Decis Res & Expt Econ, Nottingham, England
[4] MIT, Inst Data Syst & Soc, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[5] MIT, Dept Brain & Cognit Sci, E25-618, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
online research; COVID-19; demographics; diversity; Amazon Mechanical Turk; CONSEQUENCES; WORKERS;
D O I
10.3758/s13428-021-01588-4
中图分类号
B841 [心理学研究方法];
学科分类号
040201 ;
摘要
On March 16, 2020, the US Government introduced strict social distancing protocols for the United States in an effort to stem the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. This had an immediate major effect on the job market, with millions of Americans forced to find alternative ways to make a living from home. As online labor markets like Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) play a major role in social science research, concerns have been raised that the pandemic may be reducing the diversity of subjects participating in experiments. Here, we investigate this possibility empirically. Specifically, we look at 15,539 responses gathered in 23 studies run on MTurk between February and July 2020, examining the distribution of gender, age, ethnicity, political preference, and analytic cognitive style. We find notable changes on some of the measures following the imposition of nationwide social distancing: participants are more likely to be less reflective (as measured by the Cognitive Reflection Test), and somewhat less likely to be white, Democrats (traditionally over-represented on MTurk), and experienced with MTurk. Most of these differences are explained by an influx of new participants into the MTurk subject pool who are more diverse and representative - but also less attentive - than previous MTurkers.
引用
收藏
页码:2591 / 2595
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Margolis, Michele F. ;
Sances, Michael W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 58 (03) :739-753
[2]   Participant Carelessness and Fraud: Consequences for Clinical Research and Potential Solutions [J].
Chandler, Jesse ;
Sisso, Itay ;
Shapiro, Danielle .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 129 (01) :49-55
[3]   Nonnaivete among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers [J].
Chandler, Jesse ;
Mueller, Pam ;
Paolacci, Gabriele .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (01) :112-130
[4]   Cognitive reflection and decision making [J].
Frederick, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 19 (04) :25-42
[5]   The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market [J].
Horton, John J. ;
Rand, David G. ;
Zeckhauser, Richard J. .
EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 14 (03) :399-425
[6]   The persistence of pay inequality: The gender pay gap in an anonymous online labor market [J].
Litman, Leib ;
Robinson, Jonathan ;
Rosen, Zohn ;
Rosenzweig, Cheskie ;
Waxman, Joshua ;
Bates, Lisa M. .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (02)
[7]   No Participant Left Behind: Conducting Science During COVID-19 [J].
Lourenco, Stella F. ;
Tasimi, Arber .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 24 (08) :583-584
[8]   Demographic Stability on Mechanical Turk Despite COVID-19 [J].
Moss, Aaron J. ;
Rosenzweig, Cheskie ;
Robinson, Jonathan ;
Litman, Leib .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2020, 24 (09) :678-680
[9]   Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk [J].
Peer, Eyal ;
Vosgerau, Joachim ;
Acquisti, Alessandro .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (04) :1023-1031
[10]  
Prims J.P., 2018, Suspicious IP Online Flagging Tool