Purpose Despite their rising popularity, the health care profession has been slow to embrace social networking sites. These are Web-based initiatives, designed to bring people with common interests or activities under a common umbrella. The purpose of this study is to evaluate social networking patterns among upper extremity patients. Methods A total of 742 anonymous questionnaires were distributed among upper extremity outpatients, with a 62% response rate (462 were completed). Demographic characteristics (gender, age, level of education, employment, type of health insurance, and income stratification) were defined, and data on computer ownership and frequency of social networking use were collected. Social network users and nonusers were compared according to their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Results Our patient cohort consisted of 450 patients. Of those 450 patients, 418 had a high school education or higher, and 293 reported a college or graduate degree. The majority of patients (282) were employed at the time of the survey, and income was evenly distributed among U.S. Census Bureau quintiles. A total of 349 patients reported computer ownership, and 170 reported using social networking sites. When compared to nonusers, social networking users were younger (p<.001), more educated (p<.001), and more likely to be employed (p=.013). Users also had higher income levels (p=0.028) and had high rates of computer ownership (p<.001). Multivariate regression revealed that younger age (p<.001), computer ownership (p<.001), and higher education (p<.001) were independent predictors of social networking use. Most users (n=114) regularly visit a single site. Facebook was the most popular site visited (n=142), followed by My Space (n=28) and Twitter (n=16). Conclusions Of the 450 upper extremity patients in our sample, 170 use social networking sites. Younger age, higher level of education, and computer ownership were associated with social networking use. Physicians should consider expanding their use of social networking sites to reach their online patient populations. (J Hand Surg 2010;35A:819-823. Copyright (C) 2010 by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. All rights reserved.)