共 50 条
Quantitative pupillometry and transcranial Doppler measurements in patients treated with hypothermia after cardiac arrest
被引:46
作者:
Heimburger, Delphine
[1
]
Durand, Michel
[1
]
Gaide-Chevronnay, Lucie
[1
]
Dessertaine, Geraldine
[1
]
Moury, Pierre-Henri
[1
]
Bouzat, Pierre
[1
,3
,4
]
Albaladejo, Pierre
[1
,2
]
Payen, Jean-Francois
[1
,3
,4
]
机构:
[1] CHU Grenoble Alpes, Pole Anesthesie Reanimat, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[2] Univ Grenoble Alpes, CNRS TIMC IMAG UMR, ThEMAS 5225, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[3] Univ Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble Inst Neurosci, GIN, F-38000 Grenoble, France
[4] INSERM, U1216, F-38000 Grenoble, France
来源:
关键词:
Heart arrest;
Hypothermia;
Induced;
Patient outcome assessment;
Reflex;
Pupillary;
Transcranial Doppler sonography;
CEREBRAL-BLOOD-FLOW;
CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION;
THERAPEUTIC HYPOTHERMIA;
COMATOSE SURVIVORS;
LIGHT REFLEX;
INFRARED PUPILLOMETRY;
PREDICTION;
PROGNOSTICATION;
AUTOREGULATION;
METAANALYSIS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.02.026
中图分类号:
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100602 ;
摘要:
Background: Predicting outcome after cardiac arrest (CA) is particularly difficult when therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is used. We investigated the performance of quantitative pupillometry and transcranial Doppler (TCD) in this context. Methods: This prospective observational study included 82 post-CA patients. Quantitative assessment of pupillary light reflex (PLR) and TCD measurements of the two middle cerebral arteries were performed at admission (day 1) and after 24 h (day 2) during TH (33-35. degrees C) and sedation. Neurological outcome was assessed at 3 months using cerebral performance category (CPC) scores; patients were classified as having good (CPC 1-2) or poor (CPC 3-5) outcome. Prognostic performance was analyzed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: Patients with good outcome (n = 27) had higher PLR amplitude than patients with poor outcome (n = 55) both at day 1, 13% (10-18) (median, 25th-75th percentile) vs. 8% (2-11) (P < 0.001), and at day 2, 17% (13-20) vs. 8% (5-13) (P < 0.001), respectively. The AUC-ROC curves at days 1 and 2 were 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.86) and 0.82 (95% CI 0.73-0.92), respectively. The best cut-off values of PLR amplitude to predict a 3-month poor outcome were < 9% and < 11%, respectively. A PLR amplitude of < 7% at day 2 predicted a 3-month poor outcome with a specificity of 100% (95% CI 86-100) and a sensitivity of 42% (95% CI 28-58). No differences in TCD measurements were found between the two patient groups. Conclusion: PLR measurements might be informative in the prediction of outcome of post-CA patients even under sedation and hypothermia. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 93
页数:6
相关论文