Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of geopolymer cement manufacturing with Portland cement in Indian context

被引:59
作者
Meshram, R. B. [1 ]
Kumar, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Met Lab, CSIR, Met Extract & Recycling Div, Jamshedpur, Bihar, India
关键词
Geopolymer cement; Life cycle assessment; Portland cement; Industrial waste; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT ANALYSIS; BLAST-FURNACE SLAG; CO2; EMISSIONS; CONCRETE; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-021-03336-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
India is the second-leading cement producer in the world after China. Cement causes huge carbon footprint during the production and transportation of materials. Various efforts are being made to reduce the environmental impacts. Among the notable developments are the use of by-product or secondary material to develop new binders such as geopolymer cement. This paper contains a cradle-to-gate life cycle impact assessment of two types of geopolymer cement produced from blending fly ash and slag, and blending fly ash and cement in an Indian scenario. As there is no standard data available for geopolymer cement production, the primary data used were collected by producing geopolymer cement at pilot scale (5 t/d). In an Indian context, the geopolymer cement significantly reduces the global warming potential (267 kg CO2-Equiv.), abiotic depletion potential fossil (3092 MJ), abiotic depletion potential element (1.18 e(-3) kg Sb-Equiv.), human toxicity potential (249 kg DCB-Equiv.), and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (0.438 kg DCB-Equiv.) with blending fly ash and slag. The geopolymer cement produced from fly ash and slag reduces the global warming potential by 70%, abiotic depletion potential fossil by 49%, abiotic depletion potential element by 34%, and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential by 77% when compared with ordinary Portland cement of the building and construction industries. In case of geopolymer cement, the maximum impact on the environment is due to the use of an alkali solution. Based on the analysis, geopolymer cement appears more sustainable than traditional cement and thus has good potential as an alternate binder.
引用
收藏
页码:4791 / 4802
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Preparation of geopolymer concrete using Egyptian kaolin clay and the study of its environmental effects and economic cost [J].
Abbas, Rafik ;
Khereby, Mona Aly ;
Ghorab, Hanaa Y. ;
Elkhoshkhany, N. .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (03) :669-687
[2]   Design of A Sustainable Building: A Conceptual Framework for Implementing Sustainability in the Building Sector [J].
Akadiri, Peter O. ;
Chinyio, Ezekiel A. ;
Olomolaiye, Paul O. .
BUILDINGS, 2012, 2 (02) :126-152
[3]   Global CO2 emissions from cement production, 1928-2017 [J].
Andrew, Robbie M. .
EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA, 2018, 10 (04) :2213-2239
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, EA2860 NLK PROJ
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2021, STATISTA MARKET REPO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Material Safety Data Sheet
[7]   Environmental impact assessment of fly ash and silica fume based geopolymer concrete [J].
Bajpai, Rishabh ;
Choudhary, Kailash ;
Srivastava, Anshuman ;
Sangwan, Kuldip Singh ;
Singh, Manpreet .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 254
[8]   Identifying Improvement Potentials in Cement Production with Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Boesch, Michael Elias ;
Hellweg, Stefanie .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (23) :9143-9149
[9]  
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), 2008, MINIMISING RELEASE E, P5
[10]   Influence of metakaolinization temperature on the formation of zeolite 4A from kaolin [J].
Chandrasekhar, S .
CLAY MINERALS, 1996, 31 (02) :253-261